Disclaimer: This site does not store any files on its server.

Watch Der Boden unter den Füßen

Der Boden unter den Füßen is a movie starring Valerie Pachner, Pia Hierzegger, and Mavie Hörbiger. A high-powered business consultant struggles to keep her professional and personal lives from colliding after her schizophrenic...

Marie Kreutzer
Michelle Barthel, Valerie Pachner, Pia Hierzegger, Mavie Hörbiger

All Systems Operational

Product details

Genres Drama
Director Marie Kreutzer
Writer Marie Kreutzer
Stars Michelle Barthel, Valerie Pachner, Pia Hierzegger, Mavie Hörbiger
Country Austria
Also Known As The ground beneath my feet, O chão sob meus pés, The Ground beneath My Feet, Ziemia pod nogami, Zeme po mano kojomis, The Ground Beneath My Feet
Runtime 1 h 48 min
Audio Português  English  Deutsch  Italiano  Español  Français  Gaeilge  Svenska  Nederlands
Subtitles Português  日本語  Čeština  Australia  한국어  Filipino  Tiếng Việt  हिन्दी 
Quality 480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Description Not yet 30, Lola controls her personal life with the same ruthless efficiency she uses to optimize profits in her job as a high-powered business consultant. No one knows about her older sister Conny or her family's history of mental illness. But when a tragic event forces Conny back into Lola's life and her secrets begin to unravel, Lola's grip on reality seems to slips away.

Top reviews

Tuesday, 13 Oct 2020 06:46

There are many movies about the Holocaust, and if one sees one, he or she would get a little of that feeling. With this movie, there is a real feeling of what life must have been like. The life of the main character is a little bit on the negative side. He is a quiet man, who is an extremely popular man. He is on the top of the social hierarchy and he is surrounded by very well-born people. He is a kind of figurehead, who is always smiling and always smiling with his associates. One day he is so happy that he wants to make some friends. He wants to talk to the people around him. His last conversation is with a Jewish woman who has just been freed from the concentration camp. Her child is an orphan and is about to be sent to school. He says to her that it is no problem. She says that she does not know how to speak to him, and then she gets lost in the woods. He goes to find her, and finds her naked. She is very worried, and he knows that she is suffering from a nervous breakdown. He takes her back to his house. She is very happy, and they start to fall in love. But soon, she starts to get sick and the family starts to fear that she may be dying. There is a beautiful scene where she is looking at the window. The next day, she is so happy, and she asks her mother what happened to her. The mother is a little bit surprised, and then she says that she has no idea. This scene is very touching. I loved this movie. The acting is wonderful. The story is very good. It is a great movie. It is really touching. I really recommend it.
Friday, 28 Aug 2020 20:15

Not too long ago, I read a review of a film called "The New World" by the German critic, Heinz Schulz, in which he referred to the fact that, "while the directors were performing their work, the audience were left with a sort of existential sense of disappointment, for they were so deeply involved in the action that the spectator no longer saw anything else than the actors." This review made me wonder whether the viewer was really involved in the plot. Were they really watching the actors, or were they watching a different story? Is the spectator really aware of his or her own actions, or does it only happen to the characters in the movie? "The New World" seems to answer this question, and gives a glimpse into the world of cinema. When the film was made, in 1979, the cinema was still in its infancy, and few people had the opportunity to watch movies at home. Most of the films were big budget productions and thus had little chance to succeed. Therefore, the possibility of an artistic film like this being made was very limited. But "The New World" has proved to be a real breakthrough in terms of how a film can be made, and its success also helps to explain the success of the movie. The movie was shot in England, but the story is not based on any real place. It's set in New York City, but the characters never go to the city, and the story is about a boy who plays an instrument for a living. In the first part of the film, he works as a musician, and later he becomes a performer, in a theatre, but his work is not about playing, but is instead about being an actor in a play. This is what makes the film unique. Although it was shot in England, the actors are not British. It's the same story, but in the city of New York. When the characters first appear, the audience is totally immersed in the world of the film, but the film has the advantage of being filmed in black and white, so the audience can easily see the actors, the costumes and the sets. When the story develops, the audience realizes that the characters are really living their lives, but not the same story. At this point, the viewer begins to feel the same sense of disappointment as Heinz Schulz, but the film shows that, "the spectator is aware of his or her own actions." This is very important because, when the film was made, there was no standard way of making films, and no one had the chance to make a film like this. The most important factor in the success of the movie was the fact that the director, George Stevens, used a method called "the cinema of silence." When he spoke, the audience had the opportunity to hear him, but when he spoke, there was no sound. This technique was originally used by Woody Allen, but the technique was used so effectively by George Stevens that the technique
Saturday, 27 Jun 2020 20:14

I have been reading the reviews and comments on this film and I am completely shocked to find many people who do not like this film. I can not understand why people are so critical of it. I also wonder how they can find this film interesting. In fact I think it is rather boring, although the ending was not so bad. The main character was not very likable, and I think the ending was disappointing. The film is about a group of six men who are all involved in an important business that requires a lot of time and effort. They are also very confident and the film shows that they are doing good and not just spending their days playing around in the woods. The main character is a young man who is not really like them. He is arrogant, confident and he thinks he is a great leader. He does not care about the other members and the group is not his friends. He seems to be more interested in himself and his own happiness. He is not really interested in the rest of the group and his mood swings are really strange. He thinks he is going to be a great leader but is really afraid of dying and his fears get the better of him. I think that the idea of the film is interesting but the way it is filmed is not interesting at all. The way the film is shot is rather boring and not interesting at all. I think the film could have been more interesting and I think the actors did a good job. They all seemed very confident and they were not just playing around in the woods. I think the main idea was interesting but the way it was filmed was not interesting. The film is not boring at all and I think the way the film was shot is interesting. It is a great film, but the way it is shot is not interesting at all.

Write a review