Disclaimer: This site does not store any files on its server.

Watch Hot to Trot

Inside the fascinating but little-known world of same-sex competitive ballroom dance, HOT TO TROT follows a small international cast of four magnetic men and women, on and off the dance floor, over a four-year period. An immersive character study - and an idiosyncratic attack on bigotry - this rousing, powerful story unfurls with the rhythms and energy of dramatic cinema.

Gail Freedman

All Systems Operational

Top reviews

Tuesday, 28 Jul 2020 20:51

The obvious intention of the film is to explain why people are turning away from religion. But what the film doesn't do is attempt to explain why they do this. It doesn't have any real interest or passion behind it. It just tries to convey a message, and it doesn't really have any redeeming qualities. In fact, it comes off like a propaganda film. The documentary tries to give the impression that religion is harmful and divisive, but the evidence to support that argument is very weak. The documentary is even more frustrating because it attempts to give the impression that the state of Christianity is in a state of crisis, but the evidence shows that Christianity is doing very well. The documentary does have some nice bits and pieces, such as how our society tends to over-prioritize religion, and how religion is often a tool to promote the status quo. But it never addresses the problems that have led to the decline of Christianity. Rather, it concentrates on the current challenges that Christianity faces, and it tries to tell the story of how Christianity has helped to solve these problems. And that's where the problem lies. It tries to get a message across, but it never really gets one. It doesn't go into any depth, and it doesn't make any effort to give the viewer a clear picture of what it is it is trying to say. In fact, it gives a clear picture of the problems with Christianity, but never makes the effort to explain why these problems are happening. It just tries to give the viewer a message, but doesn't do anything with it. The documentary is a lot of hype, and it has no clear message.
Monday, 15 Jun 2020 09:59

When a country's population is high, it's usually because of "high fertility" or "high birth rate." This is an interesting and timely documentary, which offers a compelling argument that population growth is a very dangerous phenomenon, as it increases the likelihood of a country being conquered by other nations. As the world population grows, it's obvious that the cost of human life is increasing. This is reflected in the documentary, as an elderly person explains to a doctor that "if you want to be a good person, you have to be good for a long time." This is a good point, but it doesn't do enough to convince me that the world's population is actually growing. As I've seen documentaries on this topic, I've seen documentaries on many other topics, but this one is not a documentary. It's a series of "GIFs" or infographics, all of which are very well done. The story is presented in a very clear, concise, and descriptive way, and the graphics are great. Unfortunately, there is a very large amount of repetition throughout the film. The repetitive nature is due to the repetitive nature of the story. The story starts out with a quote from the movie "The Godfather" and then goes on to talk about why it's important to have the right amount of children. The story then jumps around a bit and goes back and forth between the birth of the country and the birth of the population, and that's it. The repetitive nature of the story is what makes it easy to understand, but it also makes it difficult to digest. I've read some of the other reviews on this page and some people have complained that the film was too boring, but I think the opposite. Most of the time, it's not the story that's boring. The story is the repetitive nature of it. That's what makes it interesting. I would recommend this film to anyone who wants to know why the world is going to run out of resources and need more people to do things. I would also recommend it to anyone who wants to see how the film industry is changing. I think this is a great documentary, but it's a little bit too long.
Tuesday, 09 Jun 2020 12:45

You know, for a movie about the AFL-CIO and the sport, I expected more from this movie. First of all, there were a few slow parts where the director didn't show enough footage, especially towards the end. Second of all, I expected a lot more from actor/director, Michael Anderson, since his previous work was "The Kissing Booth" (2004), "Be Cool" (2008) and "Interstellar" (2010). All of these movies were very interesting, and I found them interesting, but I expected more from "Trot". I think, Michael Anderson can be a very good actor, but I'm not sure if he can be a good director. What I mean is that there are many scenes where he seems to be in control, but he has a very slow pace. Maybe it's just my opinion, but I felt the movie was very slow. Also, I don't think Michael Anderson has a good directing style. He doesn't really have any real control over the footage he is using. It's very hard to say if it's because of the directing style or the lack of control. For example, the scenes where he's editing "Bad Ass" (2008), "Za'atar" (2006), "The Forbidden Zone" (2005), "The Showdown" (2006) and "Road to the Danger Zone" (2008) are all very impressive. The directing style of "Bad Ass" is also very impressive, because of the strong editing, and the strong use of music. But, the music in "Trot" is not as good as the music in "Bad Ass", because the music in "Bad Ass" was very powerful, and in "Trot", it's not as powerful. So, the acting of the main characters in "Trot" is good, but the movie is very slow. I don't know if I'd recommend it, but it's very interesting. I also think it's very difficult to have an analysis of this movie, because there's a lot of stuff I didn't like. But, I don't think I'd recommend it to people who like sports movies. But, it's still an interesting movie. I give it a 7/10.
Tuesday, 02 Jun 2020 20:31

This documentary follows a group of horse owners and trainers through their quest to bring the classic racing of the 20s to the 21st century. In many ways, it is an examination of the outdated, overblown marketing of racing that the racing industry has been plagued with since the early 1900s. The documentary also highlights the value of the modern racing format as it is designed to provide a more realistic environment for the sport. As it is not possible to recreate the actual era, this documentary focuses on the appeal of modern racing as opposed to the past. The film also highlights the need for greater public awareness about the sport, the economy of the sport and the new generation of horse owners. In my opinion, this film was a great opportunity for the industry to come together and come up with some solutions to modernize and make the sport more attractive to the public. Unfortunately, the film does not focus on the issues the industry has faced over the last several decades, instead focusing on a few new and recent events. The industry will not come together and solve these issues because the financial incentive for doing so would be too great to risk. The industry has already done a great deal of work to come up with a new format for racing and I believe they should have the courage to tackle these issues head-on. I also believe that it is important for the public to be aware of the importance of this sport and to realize that it is one of the most popular sports in the world. It is important to keep an eye on the future of the sport and not to be too distracted by the past. This documentary would have been more powerful had it focused on the issues facing the industry and not on the last few events that have been presented in the film.

Write a review