Disclaimer: This site does not store any files on its server.

Watch A Private War

A Private War is a movie starring Rosamund Pike, Alexandra Moen, and Tom Hollander. One of the most celebrated war correspondents of our time, Marie Colvin is an utterly fearless and rebellious spirit, driven to the frontline of...

Genres
Biography, War, Drama
Director
Matthew Heineman
Starring
Alexandra Moen, Faye Marsay, Rosamund Pike, Tom Hollander

All Systems Operational

Product details

Genres Biography, War, Drama
Director Matthew Heineman
Writer Marie Brenner, Arash Amel
Stars Alexandra Moen, Faye Marsay, Rosamund Pike, Tom Hollander
Country USA, UK
Also Known As Prywatna wojna, Una guerra privada, Uma Guerra Pessoal, Ο δικός της πόλεμος, Marie Colvin, 私人戰爭, Moj Osobni Rat, Milkhama Pratit, Moj lični rat, La corresponsal, プライベート・ウォー
Runtime 1 h 50 min
Audio Português  English  Deutsch  Italiano  Español  Français  Gaeilge  Svenska  Nederlands
Subtitles Português  日本語  Čeština  Australia  한국어  Filipino  Tiếng Việt  हिन्दी 
Quality 480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Description In a world where journalism is under attack, Marie Colvin (Rosamund Pike) is one of the most celebrated war correspondents of our time. Colvin is an utterly fearless and rebellious spirit, driven to the frontlines of conflicts across the globe to give voice to the voiceless, while constantly testing the limits between bravery and bravado. After being hit by a grenade in Sri Lanka, she wears a distinctive eye patch and is still as comfortable sipping martinis with London's elite as she is confronting dictators. Colvin sacrifices loving relationships, and over time, her personal life starts to unravel as the trauma she's witnessed takes its toll. Yet, her mission to show the true cost of war leads her -- along with renowned war photographer Paul Conroy (Jamie Dornan) -- to embark on the most dangerous assignment of their lives in the besieged Syrian city of Homs.

Top reviews

Monday, 01 Feb 2021 10:59

It is difficult to say whether or not George Clooney's film "Private War" is a triumph or a letdown, a good movie or a bad one. He definitely is one of the most gifted actors in the world, able to take a simple script and turn it into a complex and thoughtful story about a man who wants to do right. He is extremely good in this film, and I have never seen an actor so talented in his role. I'm not going to spoil the plot for anyone, because that is what you should do when you watch it. Suffice it to say that George Clooney portrays a young lieutenant, Lieutenant David Walker, who goes to Iraq in his early twenties and has his life turned upside down. The movie follows his rise and fall from the bottom of the barrel to the top. He does not have a lot of redeeming qualities, and he is a man who will not take no for an answer. He is a very sympathetic character, and the movie is very good at showing how his personality and his psyche is different from the other soldiers in the platoon. The film also shows how a simple slap in the face can really change a person. The most dramatic scene in the film is when Walker is pushed over the edge by his commanding officer and then is sent to Iraq to die. It is a very brutal scene, but also one of the most well-acted scenes in the movie. I don't want to give anything away, but I do want to tell you what I thought about it. "Private War" is an extremely well-made movie. It is filled with real life scenes that are dramatic and realistic. The plot is great, and the movie is one that I would recommend to any audience. I am a huge fan of George Clooney, and I am glad that he decided to be in this film. I can't wait to see what he does next. My Rating: 7/10.
Friday, 29 Jan 2021 23:10

I guess if you have ever seen any of Clint Eastwood's movies you know how that feels. And you might say "That's what I'm gonna do to him", but I think it's better to have your own opinion. This movie is not an attack on the American military or its history, but rather a retelling of the events that led to the conflict between Japan and the US. As you can see, there are many parts that are true. This movie is a bit long but overall it's very good. The cast is not that great, but it's not that bad. I like many of Clint's movies and this is no exception, but I think it's very obvious that he likes his films a bit more. As for the story, I don't really know what's wrong with it, but it's hard to believe that it's a true story, so I won't say anything else about it. I think the best part of this movie is probably the beautiful cinematography. The war scenes are so realistic that it's almost impossible to believe that the events are real. And the scenery is perfect. In addition, there is a great supporting cast. I really don't know who they are, but they are really good actors. To conclude, I think the acting is fine. The cinematography is nice. The music is perfect. I don't think it's good, but it's pretty good. And this is the best part of the movie. It's probably the most exciting part. But that doesn't mean it's the best part of the movie. There are so many parts that are unrealistic that it makes the movie boring. But this is not the reason to dislike it. Clint Eastwood should have been allowed to make a movie that's a bit longer, and better. There is some really nice scenes in this movie, but there is also some really boring parts, especially the second half. I recommend this movie to Clint Eastwood fans and everyone else. But it's not a masterpiece. It's not a must-see. But it's good.
Sunday, 29 Nov 2020 01:36

The English speaking, and thus Western, powers of the 1940s were not only preoccupied with keeping the world from the clutches of communism but were also under an internal threat of a new kind of militarism. The strategy of the war had been to send out men to the front lines, far from home, to make the lives of those in uniform unbearable. The men who did this fought for the very notion of freedom, and at the cost of their own lives. This is an extremely well told story of the Pacific War. The film is made by the same man who directed the epic "Pearl Harbour", and it takes us back to those times. It tells the story of two very different men, and the men who fought for them. They were, in many ways, similar. Both were in the UK Army, both fought for the freedom of their country. But, of course, their war was different, and the film tells the story of a men who fought for their country, and who, at the end of the war, became a symbol of the old west, or rather, a symbol of a new west, which had been created from the ashes of the old west. The film is not too political, though it does touch upon some very sensitive issues. One of the key themes of the film is the relationship between the two men, the French and the English, who fought, and had fought, for their country. The relationship between the two men is shown in a number of different ways, both good and bad. The film shows a man who is weak, but has a spirit and a determination which others don't understand. The film shows the fact that he has a little bit of a 'child' inside him, which was always there, but was denied the opportunity to express itself. This film is a very important film, and a must see.
Monday, 19 Oct 2020 02:33

War has changed the world for better or worse, but it is a fact that the same things happen again and again. These days, the modern military is very much one of the things that has changed the world. From the battlefields of World War I, to the modern battlefields of the Korean and Vietnam Wars, modern wars have not changed the world, but they have changed people. Those who live in a war zone are those who have a certain emotional response to the events, and those who do not. In many ways, the modern military has become like the modern human. The soldiers, their families, and those who have been there with them, have changed. They are no longer the people who were brought up in a small, rural town, and raised by a single parent. They have become people of different backgrounds, and their attitudes are different. There are people who are very much attached to their guns, and are prepared to die for them. Others are quite scared, and want to know the truth about what they are doing. And, some are just people. For the most part, it is hard to say what is better: the soldiers in the war zones, or the civilians in the towns and cities. Sometimes, it is difficult to tell whether it is better for the soldiers or for the civilians. But the fact that it is very hard to say whether it is better for the soldiers, is exactly why it is important to know who is fighting and who is fighting for the wrong reasons. This movie was extremely well made, and does a very good job in portraying the conflict between the soldiers and the civilians. I also found it very interesting to see the difference between the two cultures, and how the civilians are trying to adapt to the culture that the soldiers have brought. It is an interesting movie, and should be seen by those who want to learn more about the conflicts that are taking place today. It is also interesting to see how this movie compares to other war movies. It is not at all like Saving Private Ryan, or The Hurt Locker, or Pearl Harbor, or The Last of the Mohicans, or The Thin Red Line, or any other war movie that I have seen. This movie is not about the war. It is about how people have changed and how they have changed. It is also about how the soldiers have changed and how they have changed. This movie is about changing people, and the way that people change, and how the soldiers have changed


Write a review