Disclaimer: This site does not store any files on its server.

Watch The Hottest August

The Hottest August is a movie starring Clare Coulter. Ordinary people in New York are asked to talk about their lives and their hopes for the future in a time marked by political division and climate change.

Brett Story
Clare Coulter

All Systems Operational

Product details

Genres Documentary
Director Brett Story
Stars Clare Coulter
Country USA, Canada
Runtime 1 h 34 min
Audio Português  English  Deutsch  Italiano  Español  Français  Gaeilge  Svenska  Nederlands
Subtitles Português  日本語  Čeština  Australia  한국어  Filipino  Tiếng Việt  हिन्दी 
Quality 480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Description Ordinary people in New York are asked to talk about their lives and their hopes for the future in a time marked by political division and climate change.

Top reviews

Friday, 02 Oct 2020 04:42

I recently saw this at the Sydney International Film Festival, and it really grabbed my attention, even more so than I thought it would. I loved the fact that it wasn't just talking heads, but included some real-life footage, so that I could see how the shots were made, the story and the actual relationship of the people in the movie, and most importantly the humour. It really shows how very much this community actually care about each other. One of the best things about the movie was the fact that it showed a lot of the close-ups and medium shots that were used to make the film, and I was really impressed at how much they had taken. Also, it really showed that a lot of the work that went into making the film was still going on. This really really showed how much work went into making this, as well as how much they cared about the characters and the relationships of the people in the movie, making this really heartwarming and heart-wrenching. The stories told in this film were really beautiful, and I really loved how they showed the funny side of the community, showing how the close-up shots were used to really show the comedy, as well as how much care the people had for each other. It also showed how much the people were willing to do for one another, so that you could feel for them, and how important they were to the story, which made this really great. All in all, I really liked this, and it really made me want to go back and check out more of their work.
Wednesday, 26 Aug 2020 10:04

It's time for another episode of the annual "Where Have All the Cool Kids Gone?" series. As we did with the second annual episode in April, we decided to make it a sort of sequel to this year's documentary "10 Things I Hate About You" with an old friend of mine, Dafna. Dafna is an intelligent, educated, free-spirited 23-year-old who is a sort of a wild child in her own little world. She's an anthropologist, a biologist, a poet, an ethnographer and a disc jockey. She lives in a pretty apartment in Manhattan, where she owns a pretty bike, and a pretty pink Vespa. Dafna is always complaining about how the city sucks and she lives on the upper west side of Manhattan, and she hates the "mediaeval" architecture of all the new buildings, which is clearly a more interesting time in human history than when she grew up in the 70s. The film opens up with a telling interview with her. We learn that she is not a "new person" at all. She is an old person who has lived here all her life, but it is her current environment which is not very interesting. Dafna really doesn't like how the city is changing. She complains that there are too many restaurants on the same street, and her garden is not being tended to. She has a lot of problems with the neighborhood, especially with the block that was purchased by the Co-op building. She complains that the neighborhood is gentrifying faster than the buildings that surround it. She tells us that this isn't a problem of her own making. The Co-op building has a couple of floors of vacant lots, and one of the tenants is moving out, and there are more apartments coming down the block, and a condo building is being built. Dafna was one of the original residents of the condo building. She says that she wants to live in a community with more services and more educational opportunities. She complains about the Co-op building for the same reason. There's an argument over the size of the window in the Co-op building where there used to be a field where students could go and play. Dafna says that the window is too small. The lobby is full of construction workers, and the employees there don't seem to care much about the windows. One of the tenants is complaining about how bad the food is, because it's not really available. Dafna points out that there is a new tenant in the building who is making great time with a young child and the other tenants in the building have a tradition of having their own baby. I'm not sure if she really believes in the virtues of individualism and communalism, but Dafna says that if she lives in a community with all the other residents, there is no point in complaining about how much money the Co-op building has. This is an interesting movie, not to be missed.
Thursday, 13 Aug 2020 11:06

In the summer of 2011, I went to see the Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest on the first day of its opening in the theatre. It was an incredible experience. I cried with excitement for the second film, and that was the only film I felt truly fulfilled. After seeing Pirates 2, I went into the theatre again to watch Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl. I went into the theater the first time with great expectations. The excitement I felt during the first Pirates film had completely vanished. I was numb and apathetic. The first film was the biggest disappointment of the summer. I couldn't wait for the second one to start. When the film began, I could tell it was going to be good. The movie was about as good as the first one. It was faster, funnier, and more emotional than the first one. The acting was good, and the story was better. The problem with Pirates 2 is that I have a hard time relating to the main character Jack Sparrow. There was no emotion that was good enough to make me feel the same way Jack Sparrow felt. The acting was a little bit better, but the story was just a little bit worse. There was nothing memorable in the story, but the acting was better. The director John Moore was extremely successful at portraying the story of pirates. The problem with the second film is that the story was just a little bit better. We know Jack Sparrow to be a character who goes through many adventures and is a huge pirate. The second film was not the best of the year, but it was still an amazing film. The production of the second film was extremely successful. The costumes, sets, and special effects were all very impressive. This is definitely the best film of the summer. It is the best film of the year. I give the movie a 9/10.
Friday, 07 Aug 2020 04:21

The funny thing about this movie is that it is actually quite serious. We don't need to see this kind of movie to know the need to make it so that it can be made by so many other people. But it is the case that all the other artists and actresses involved with this movie are that. So this kind of movie is completely different than a lot of other comedies. Maybe the whole idea is just to get a laugh from watching this kind of movie. Maybe. Or maybe the idea is to show that what goes on in Hollywood is not what we think it is and the reason for it. Maybe this is the idea behind the movie. But maybe this is the reason behind the movie. I don't know. But I definitely think it is the idea behind the movie. For this movie is a real high note, because you can see what is going on in Hollywood. And I am talking about one of the top stars. Julia Roberts. This is a very hard and serious movie. Julia Roberts is one of the top actors of our time and she is not that funny. This movie is about her life. Her life is one of the most important things that makes this movie so funny. It is about what happens to her in the year 2005. Her real life is a sad and very hard experience, that she probably didn't want to have in the first place. It is about her job as a lawyer and the other things that she does to try to keep her relationship with her husband. And this movie is more than funny because of this. It is also a very serious movie because of all the bad things that Julia Roberts is going through. But it is funny because of that. It is a real comedy. There is also the famous actress who plays her mother, Joanna. She is not a famous actress, but she is very well known and she plays the mother very well. She is very funny. This movie is very good because of all the actors and actresses involved. But the story is the real story of this movie. The main story is the life of Julia Roberts and the story of Joanna Roberts. This is a movie about how Hollywood works. And what makes it so bad. It is really important to know the fact. It is not the real reason why Hollywood is bad. It is not a real explanation. But it is a real movie about how Hollywood works. And it is really funny. You don't need to watch this movie if you are not a fan of Julia Roberts or Joanna Roberts. It is not really that funny. It is not really serious. But it is a funny movie that is pretty good. It is funny because of all the actors and actresses involved. And it is really good because of that.
Saturday, 18 Jul 2020 22:38

A superb and insightful documentary about the AIDS crisis in America. Many of the cases depicted in the film are not new, but they show the toll of that epidemic. The film is less about what AIDS is and more about what it is not. The diagnosis of AIDS is no new phenomenon. In the late 1940s, many people were infected by needle sticks, but the disease was believed to be a "gay disease" and was usually suppressed. In the 1960s, more people were diagnosed, and it was easier to treat. More recently, it has become harder to treat. Now, all of the symptoms are known, so doctors and researchers have to try to find ways to treat it. This film is more about the social issues that arise from the diagnosis and treatment of AIDS than it is about the actual disease. While many of the diseases that cause it were believed to be diseases of a "gay lifestyle" or in that "sexual orientation", they are in fact caused by the virus itself. There is no such thing as "gayness", but the disease itself is what causes homosexuality. In the film, the author describes how the media helped create the "gay panic" about AIDS. The stigma associated with it has made it difficult to treat, and the epidemic has left many people with HIV, even though they are no longer active carriers. Most of the patients in the film were not aware that they were infected, and many did not know they were infected until they became sick. AIDS in America has been the most lethal epidemic of all time. While it is still unknown how many people are infected with HIV today, estimates put the number of new infections in the US at close to 1 million each year. This documentary is a must see for anyone who cares about the future of the AIDS crisis. See it, and decide for yourself.
Sunday, 14 Jun 2020 18:32

The Hottest August is a short documentary film that tells the tale of the gangsters, and the social situations and realities that made them who they were. It looks at the rise and fall of two large criminal families and a few others, and tells the story of the two drug dealers, and the plight of the poor youth who did them in. The gangsters in the film come from the inner city of Chicago. They are from the neighborhood where most gangs are from. They have broken up over the years and they came back to try and get back together. Some had family ties to the gangs in the area that they originally broke off from. In the film they talk about the various levels of respect they have for the gangsters and how much they valued their lives. They say they were "suckers", meaning they were addicted to drugs, and at one point they even revealed they did so for a drug deal. They had nothing else to do for a living. They said they felt worthless and wanted to be like the gangsters they admired. A lot of them did not feel they were capable of doing anything for themselves. They were being forced into crimes because of the lack of education in the inner city. They talk about how they were not able to separate the positive aspects of the gangsters and the negative. The majority of the gangsters came from the black neighborhoods of Chicago. They are not really from the inner city of Chicago, they came from the suburbs. They wanted to belong to something, or they felt like they belonged to a gang. They felt that they did not belong anywhere else. Many of them were killed in gun battles with other gangs and gang rivals. When they finally came back together, they felt betrayed and almost abandoned by the gangs who had abandoned them. Some of the gangsters said that their families and friends had either been killed or been shot in the gang wars. Many of the gangsters started to feel that their families had been killed. Many of them would not return home to their families for a long time. They were desperate to get their families back. They often did not return home until the end of the summer. Their families were torn apart by the war. The gangsters are often described as tough, but they are actually soft. Many of them were vicious criminals. They became addicted to drugs, and would do anything to get money. They would say they were a class of their own. Many were given the nickname "bobby" by other gangsters. Their parents were not only verbally abusive to them, they were also verbally and physically abusive to them. They were like their own personal gang, and they treated the gangsters as if they were their own. The gangsters say that they had no life, and did not care for their families. They often could not pay the rent, and in one case, they had to get money from their families for the rent. They had no job, and they did not have the money to buy food for their families. Many of the gangsters had a similar attitude towards the police. Some were almost as good as the police. They were going to do anything for the gangsters. They would beat the gangsters, even if they had to steal to get the money. The gangsters would give the gangsters to the police and say, "You have to give us the money for them, they are stealing our money!" They would beat up the police if they

Write a review