Disclaimer: This site does not store any files on its server.

Watch SGT. Will Gardner

SGT. Will Gardner is a movie starring Max Martini, Omari Hardwick, and Lily Rabe. A troubled Iraq War veteran struggling to reintegrate into society sets out on a cross-country journey with the hope of reuniting with his young son.

Adventure, War, Action, Drama
Max Martini
Max Martini, Lily Rabe, Robert Patrick, Omari Hardwick

All Systems Operational

Product details

Genres Adventure, War, Action, Drama
Director Max Martini
Writer Max Martini
Stars Max Martini, Lily Rabe, Robert Patrick, Omari Hardwick
Country USA
Also Known As Sgt. Will Gardner
Runtime 2 h 5 min
Audio Português  English  Deutsch  Italiano  Español  Français  Gaeilge  Svenska  Nederlands
Subtitles Português  日本語  Čeština  Australia  한국어  Filipino  Tiếng Việt  हिन्दी 
Quality 480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Description A troubled Iraq War veteran struggling to reintegrate into society sets out on a cross-country journey with the hope of reuniting with his young son.

Top reviews

Sunday, 01 Nov 2020 04:14

I had heard that this movie was very much anti-war, anti-military, and anti-capitalism. It is the antithesis of the last three of these, and as such, I was really intrigued by this movie. I read a review that stated that this movie was a 'waste of time.' That was my first thought, but the movie was definitely entertaining. First of all, the movie is about the two characters, Lieutenant Dillon (Thomas Jane) and Private Murphy (Rory Culkin). While they are seen as two sides of the same coin, they both have their opinions. The first of these is about being a good soldier. The second is about being a bad soldier. The reason the movie is mostly anti-war is because of the information that Dillon is given on the war and the men that were in it. This gives him the perspective of his own experiences. This also allows him to identify with the soldiers, even if his view of them is very different from theirs. I also thought the movie was interesting because it showed the opinions of a man who was more aware of his role in the war and how that influenced him to the point where he wanted to be a soldier. He was also aware of his environment and how he viewed it, which was really interesting to watch. This also allowed the viewer to see a side of Dillon that was completely different from the others. I also thought the performances were great. Thomas Jane was good as Dillon, but he was not the main character. He was there to explain his perspective on the war and how it affected him. Rory Culkin was also great, although I am not sure how he portrayed Murphy. I thought he was very under-utilized, although I was happy with his performance. This is one of the better movies I have seen this year, although I was not expecting it to be that good. I give it a 7 out of 10. It was well-done and worth watching.
Sunday, 25 Oct 2020 11:59

The real-life war between the US and the Soviet Union was something else. Most American historians, and the American public, prefer to remember it as the Vietnam War, not the other way around. That is a big mistake. A lot of people do not understand that the US was a full-fledged imperial power in the region during the 1950's, and the Soviet Union was just the regional counter-revolutionary force for the US. So the war was a proxy conflict between two imperial powers. The movie really portrays that well. There is no doubt that the US and the Soviets used every means available to achieve their objectives. They did not hesitate to engage in direct attacks. I think this is something the movie will not succeed in changing, even if it could have the same effect. The war is supposed to be a low-intensity war, but it was actually a really intense one. This was not the kind of war the US had to tolerate, but the kind of war that the Soviets had to fight. That is why the movie is so compelling. I love how it depicts the US as a perfect democracy. As for the fact that the Soviet Union committed atrocities, it is well known that many of its generals and soldiers were repressed during the period. I really do not think that this is an important point. The movie is made in a realistic way. It does not condone or endorse them. The movie is very well-made. The graphics are also quite good. There are very few minor flaws. I don't want to give anything away, but the military hardware in the movie is a bit unrealistic. The trailers and the previews make the impression that the movie will have this kind of graphics. But that is not the case. The graphics in the movie are realistic, but the real-life-weapons are unrealistic. The guns were very accurate and realistic-looking. There is nothing wrong with the graphics. The main problem is the soldiers. The movie has a lot of action and explosions, and the soldiers are very well-drawn. But they are still not that good. They do not look realistic enough. The Americans have a reputation of being really good at designing realistic-looking soldiers. But, to be honest, I am not really impressed by the American soldier. There is nothing that really makes me like him. It is something like this. I think the American soldier is a bit better than the Russian one. He has more personality and he is not one of those cool American-style guys. The other problem with the movie is the plot. There is a lot of twists and turns in the story. The plot is actually too convoluted. I was never really sure what was going to happen. Also, the movie does not really show how the war was fought. The Soviet Union was fighting the Americans and the US was fighting the Soviets. The movie tries to present the war as a conflict between two imperial powers. That is one of the reasons I do not really like the movie. But, what really holds this movie together is the acting. The movie really has a lot of firepower, and the acting is really good. The actors are believable and not exaggerated. Michael Pena is a good actor, and he was convincing in this movie. Other actors like Richard Dreyfuss, Guy Pearce, and Ian Holm are also good. The one that really stands out is Dustin Hoffman. He is a very good actor. The movie is not one of his best works, but it is still an impressive one. The cast did a great job. The cinematography was pretty good as well. I do not think the movie is a masterpiece. It is not really my type of movie, but it is a pretty good movie.

Write a review