Disclaimer: This site does not store any files on its server.

Watch SGT. Will Gardner

(841) 5.9 125 min 2019 Subtitles and Closed Captions

SGT. Will Gardner is a movie starring Max Martini, Omari Hardwick, and Lily Rabe. A troubled Iraq War veteran struggling to reintegrate into society sets out on a cross-country journey with the hope of reuniting with his young son.

Genres
Adventure, War, Action, Drama
Director
Max Martini
Starring
Max Martini, Lily Rabe, Robert Patrick, Omari Hardwick

All Systems Operational

Product details

Genres Adventure, War, Action, Drama
Director Max Martini
Writer Max Martini
Stars Max Martini, Lily Rabe, Robert Patrick, Omari Hardwick
Country USA
Also Known As Sgt. Will Gardner
Runtime 2 h 5 min
Audio Português  English  Deutsch  Italiano  Español  Français  Gaeilge  Svenska  Nederlands
Subtitles Português  日本語  Čeština  Australia  한국어  Filipino  Tiếng Việt  हिन्दी 
Quality 480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Description A troubled Iraq War veteran struggling to reintegrate into society sets out on a cross-country journey with the hope of reuniting with his young son.

Download adventure «SGT. Will Gardner»

Blu-ray
16.24 GB
DVD
5.44 GB
Windows
5.54 GB
MacOS
7.39 GB
MKV
5.69 GB
MP4
5.57 GB
H.264
6.14 GB
H.265
5.57 GB
AVI
3.37 GB
MOV
6.96 GB
DivX
7.77 GB

Customers who watched action «SGT. Will Gardner» also watched

  1. Honeyland
    Honeyland
  2. Miss Bala Available on Prime
    Miss Bala
  3. Ready Player One
    Ready Player One
  4. Three Peaks Available on Prime
    Three Peaks
  5. Real Steel
    Real Steel
  6. Bad Teacher Available on Prime
    Bad Teacher
  7. Alien
    Alien
  8. Half the Picture Available on Prime
    Half the Picture
  9. Followed
    Followed
  10. Five Seasons: The Gardens of Piet Oudolf Available on Prime
    Five Seasons: The Gardens of Piet Oudolf
  11. Never Heard
    Never Heard
  12. Jaws Available on Prime
    Jaws
  13. Cuban Food Stories
    Cuban Food Stories
  14. Hitlers Hollywood Available on Prime
    Hitlers Hollywood
  15. Just Mercy
    Just Mercy

26 customer reviews about war «SGT. Will Gardner»

2.5 out of 5 stars 2.5 out of 5 stars

Top reviews

Margaret
Thursday, 11 Feb 2021 05:49

I have seen many movies from this era. "The Rock" and "Saving Private Ryan" are two of the best. This one is a good movie. It is not a great movie, but it is not a bad movie either. It is just an OK movie. Not a masterpiece. For example, I have seen better portrayals of men in the past than this. I don't see why this movie was rated so low. It's a decent movie. It doesn't do anything new. It is an OK movie. It is not a good movie. I didn't find it amazing or fantastic. It was OK. I will see it again, but I will not go to see it again.
Louis Berry
Thursday, 04 Feb 2021 23:04

This movie is not particularly interesting. It lacks the dynamism and fighting of Rambo, but it doesn't do too badly for a war movie. A good example of this is the scene where General Jackson shoots the hippie rebel leader at the end. That was a nice way to get a good payoff out of the film. After that it becomes more of a show about the Japanese soldiers. It's also hard to find any memorable scenes or quotes. It's just the same old, same old.
Maria Weaver
Tuesday, 05 Jan 2021 20:42

The most infamous and violent of all war movies, and one of the most accessible. Also one of the most popular and widely viewed movies of all time. The battle scenes are pretty cool, but some of the script was way to cliche. And some of the actors are kind of weird. The big point I really liked is the action sequences, like the tank battle and the atomic bomb attack. The movie isn't the biggest or most violent war movie, but it is definitely an adrenaline-pumping movie with lots of action. I give this movie an 8.5 out of 10.
Lori Nichols
Monday, 04 Jan 2021 03:53

I know this is just a movie, but I have to say, that although I don't know a whole lot about the Allied Forces, I really enjoyed this movie. I thought it was a good story, that you can really enjoy watching. The acting is good, the characters were well developed. The best part about the movie is the fact that it is real, and I like this fact. You will learn a lot about the war, and you will enjoy this movie.
Ashley
Tuesday, 22 Dec 2020 04:54

I found this movie very good, but it was so long that I felt that there were some problems in it. The first hour was good. The cast was great. However, I felt that there were some problems with the story. If the movie had been shorter it would have been a great movie. I gave this movie a 7 out of 10.
Dennis
Sunday, 13 Dec 2020 20:05

First of all I must say that I have never seen the Patton film series, but I guess that there are a lot of fans out there, so I thought I would check this out. Patton is a movie that may not appeal to everyone. For a young boy or girl, it may have appeal. But for someone like me who is not a teenager, this movie may not appeal to you. It is all about character and it is the film that gives the characters of Patton and Cunningham a real life, and what makes the audience sympathize with their characters. As the story is set in the 1920's, one can relate to the story and the movies characterisation. One of the best parts of this film is the fact that it is about the characters. All of the actors in the film do a fantastic job in their roles, especially the villain Patton. Patton is a very talented actor who is very well known in the media, and this role gave him a big shot in the arm for his career. This film was directed by Tom Shadyac who has had many excellent films in his career and Patton is no exception. This film has many great scenes and is an overall enjoyable film.
Robert
Thursday, 26 Nov 2020 16:41

During the war, the Brits were captured by the Germans, and were forced to train and work for the Germans. This was before the first American regiment was formed and the Brits were forced to be in the work camp for about 2 years. These were the guys we are familiar with in war movies. They were very poorly trained, but they did what they could. This movie does a good job of portraying the difficulties of the job in this time. There is a lot of fighting and some very close combat. The movie is also about being in the British work camp, and what it was like. It portrays the effort that was put in, but it was a job that was extremely hard. It was not much fun being there, because everyone in there was a b*tch. You had to be tough to survive, and there was no room for pity. Even in the war, this was the case. The Brits didn't have to worry about what they ate, they had to worry about what they did, and that was the same for the Americans. It is also a bit of a slap to the Americans, since they were responsible for most of the hardships they faced. That was also a part of the movie. The movie is good, but it could have been better. It could have been more realistic and it could have had more of a dramatic effect. Also, some scenes are a bit dark. I do not know if that was a problem with the movie or the director, but the movie was a bit slow, but I do not think that was a problem with the movie.
Stephanie
Friday, 13 Nov 2020 17:42

I have to say, this was a pretty good film. With a great cast, very effective action sequences and just a very interesting storyline. The film is based on a true story and the story is quite touching. I felt the film did a pretty good job of showing the horrors that are everyday for women in war torn countries. All the characters are well played, especially the main female lead. The film is also somewhat of a commentary on the war itself, as well as how one girl's courage could save many. It's very uplifting, especially in the end when she realizes she's never going to see her family again. I would definitely recommend this film to anyone that's looking for a good action film.
Dennis M.
Sunday, 01 Nov 2020 04:14

I had heard that this movie was very much anti-war, anti-military, and anti-capitalism. It is the antithesis of the last three of these, and as such, I was really intrigued by this movie. I read a review that stated that this movie was a 'waste of time.' That was my first thought, but the movie was definitely entertaining. First of all, the movie is about the two characters, Lieutenant Dillon (Thomas Jane) and Private Murphy (Rory Culkin). While they are seen as two sides of the same coin, they both have their opinions. The first of these is about being a good soldier. The second is about being a bad soldier. The reason the movie is mostly anti-war is because of the information that Dillon is given on the war and the men that were in it. This gives him the perspective of his own experiences. This also allows him to identify with the soldiers, even if his view of them is very different from theirs. I also thought the movie was interesting because it showed the opinions of a man who was more aware of his role in the war and how that influenced him to the point where he wanted to be a soldier. He was also aware of his environment and how he viewed it, which was really interesting to watch. This also allowed the viewer to see a side of Dillon that was completely different from the others. I also thought the performances were great. Thomas Jane was good as Dillon, but he was not the main character. He was there to explain his perspective on the war and how it affected him. Rory Culkin was also great, although I am not sure how he portrayed Murphy. I thought he was very under-utilized, although I was happy with his performance. This is one of the better movies I have seen this year, although I was not expecting it to be that good. I give it a 7 out of 10. It was well-done and worth watching.
Doris
Sunday, 25 Oct 2020 11:59

The real-life war between the US and the Soviet Union was something else. Most American historians, and the American public, prefer to remember it as the Vietnam War, not the other way around. That is a big mistake. A lot of people do not understand that the US was a full-fledged imperial power in the region during the 1950's, and the Soviet Union was just the regional counter-revolutionary force for the US. So the war was a proxy conflict between two imperial powers. The movie really portrays that well. There is no doubt that the US and the Soviets used every means available to achieve their objectives. They did not hesitate to engage in direct attacks. I think this is something the movie will not succeed in changing, even if it could have the same effect. The war is supposed to be a low-intensity war, but it was actually a really intense one. This was not the kind of war the US had to tolerate, but the kind of war that the Soviets had to fight. That is why the movie is so compelling. I love how it depicts the US as a perfect democracy. As for the fact that the Soviet Union committed atrocities, it is well known that many of its generals and soldiers were repressed during the period. I really do not think that this is an important point. The movie is made in a realistic way. It does not condone or endorse them. The movie is very well-made. The graphics are also quite good. There are very few minor flaws. I don't want to give anything away, but the military hardware in the movie is a bit unrealistic. The trailers and the previews make the impression that the movie will have this kind of graphics. But that is not the case. The graphics in the movie are realistic, but the real-life-weapons are unrealistic. The guns were very accurate and realistic-looking. There is nothing wrong with the graphics. The main problem is the soldiers. The movie has a lot of action and explosions, and the soldiers are very well-drawn. But they are still not that good. They do not look realistic enough. The Americans have a reputation of being really good at designing realistic-looking soldiers. But, to be honest, I am not really impressed by the American soldier. There is nothing that really makes me like him. It is something like this. I think the American soldier is a bit better than the Russian one. He has more personality and he is not one of those cool American-style guys. The other problem with the movie is the plot. There is a lot of twists and turns in the story. The plot is actually too convoluted. I was never really sure what was going to happen. Also, the movie does not really show how the war was fought. The Soviet Union was fighting the Americans and the US was fighting the Soviets. The movie tries to present the war as a conflict between two imperial powers. That is one of the reasons I do not really like the movie. But, what really holds this movie together is the acting. The movie really has a lot of firepower, and the acting is really good. The actors are believable and not exaggerated. Michael Pena is a good actor, and he was convincing in this movie. Other actors like Richard Dreyfuss, Guy Pearce, and Ian Holm are also good. The one that really stands out is Dustin Hoffman. He is a very good actor. The movie is not one of his best works, but it is still an impressive one. The cast did a great job. The cinematography was pretty good as well. I do not think the movie is a masterpiece. It is not really my type of movie, but it is a pretty good movie.
Albert Walsh
Sunday, 18 Oct 2020 19:44

Good use of old war footage. Great cinematography. Nicely shot. Good plot.
Amanda
Tuesday, 22 Sep 2020 04:20

The movie was very well done. As a movie I found it much better than most of the movie I have seen lately. The story was well put together, and it kept my interest from start to finish. This is a movie I would recommend to any one. The acting was great, especially by the actor who played Freamon. I recommend this movie to anyone who enjoys action movies, or who just wants to see a great story told in a very entertaining way.
Thomas J.
Monday, 21 Sep 2020 07:02

This movie is a great tale of a Vietnam vet who learns that he is in a war he does not want to be in. He is a hard-nosed Sergeant Will Gardner who feels that the Vietnam war is going nowhere fast. He feels that he has no choice but to put his fellow soldiers in harm's way. He does not have the same depth of feeling that his comrades have for him and the story that is told is very realistic. The movie is based on the book by Patrick O'Hara. This movie is very well done and is a must see.
Susan H.
Sunday, 13 Sep 2020 22:15

In 1945, a group of American soldiers find themselves in the middle of a deadly massacre that's only the beginning of a battle for survival and survival of the human race. This movie is an accurate portrayal of WW2, although it was edited for VHS and not the theatrical release of the movie that it should have been. This movie should have been released in theaters, and I'm surprised that the studio refused to show it to audiences. It has been added to the DVD release of the film, and I recommend you see it. I recommend this movie to anyone who enjoys a good war story. This movie tells the story of the 3 men that are facing the ultimate battle, and how their team mates can make or break their chances of survival. It is a story that is told very well.
Walter Weaver
Wednesday, 09 Sep 2020 14:52

GODFATHER is a movie that I never thought I would enjoy, but I have. It's a real drama and action movie. It's not your average action movie, but it has action and drama in it. The acting in this movie is superb. The characters are realistic, and the actors are perfect. The script is also very good, it's very well written. The direction is excellent. The music in this movie is also good. It has a good mixture of all kinds of music. The best thing about this movie is that it is not your average action movie. It's not a typical war movie, but it is an action movie. It's a very good movie. I rate this movie 9/10.
Maria
Thursday, 27 Aug 2020 15:53

I liked this movie because I enjoyed the story and the military and the military people in it. However, I found that I could not relate to all of the characters, especially not the military. If you are a military person and enjoy the military, then I would recommend this movie. If you are not a military person, then I would not recommend this movie.
Joseph Riley
Monday, 24 Aug 2020 16:15

I thought the movie was pretty good. I thought the acting was excellent. The story was great. I liked the military aspect of it. I think the special effects were pretty good. I also thought the movie was well done. I did enjoy the military aspects of the movie, but I didn't really think it was great because it was kind of cheesy. Overall I liked the movie, but I think there could've been more in it. I think there should have been a bit more history about the Normandy invasion. I think it would have been better if they didn't just show the military aspect of it. I would've liked to see some of the other parts of the movie.
Kimberly Cox
Sunday, 23 Aug 2020 11:28

This is a very entertaining and well made movie. The acting is superb, the directing is great and the characters are all very well fleshed out. The story is very well done and the story of the war is very engaging. The movie is very entertaining. The music score is also excellent. I recommend this movie to anyone who enjoys a good war movie. My rating is 8/10.
Jordan Reynolds
Monday, 10 Aug 2020 12:30

I have watched this film many times and it still entertains me. I think that this movie is a must watch for anyone who loves war films. It is a typical "war film" in the sense that it is made by the same people who made the "Platoon" and "Full Metal Jacket". It is a very good film with some great dialogs, good battle scenes, and a really good performance by the leading man, Eric Bana. The movie is about a platoon of US Army soldiers that is sent into a war zone. They are trained to fight like the enemy and when the enemy arrives, the men go back to the front line. The film does not waste time explaining the history of the conflict. It is a simple war film about the Americans trying to survive in a war that is much more difficult and violent than the ones they have fought in the past. It is very enjoyable to watch, and a great film to watch with your friends.
Philip T.
Tuesday, 28 Jul 2020 01:42

Well.well.well.this movie is really hard to review. I have to give it a good rating. You see the rating I'm giving it: a perfect 10. Not only was this movie great, but I really liked it. The acting, the plot, the graphics, the music, the cinematography, the action, the cinematography, the special effects, and of course the general story. It was one of the most enjoyable movies I've seen in a long time. I think you should see it, even if you don't like war movies. And the war scenes were real and incredible. I'll be surprised if this movie isn't nominated for an Oscar. You have to see it. And if you do, you have to buy the DVD.
Raymond
Friday, 24 Jul 2020 09:06

This is a great war movie, especially when you watch it for the first time. It was made in 1990, but it's still very relevant today. I thought that the acting was very good. When I saw the movie, I thought that the characters were very strong. I would like to watch this movie again, and I would recommend it to anyone who likes war movies. There is one thing that bothers me about the movie, however. I don't think that the movie would be any good without the bloody scenes. For example, the scene when the soldier dies is very bloody and very graphic. That is not a good thing for a movie, as the audience should be able to understand what is happening. I would recommend the movie to anyone who likes war movies.
Catherine R.
Wednesday, 24 Jun 2020 06:43

Saw this movie last night and I must say, it was excellent. I thought the acting was excellent. I thought the movie was well-paced and kept you on your toes. I thought the plot was interesting and the movie did a good job of showing the brutality of war. It had a lot of action in it. The acting was very good. The way that it was filmed was great. I don't know what everyone is talking about about it being over-the-top. I thought the way that it was filmed was great. The music was very good. The action scenes were good. It had a lot of action and it kept you on your toes. It had a good plot and the movie did a good job of showing the brutality of war. I think that the movie was good. I think it was a good movie.
Rachel Hughes
Thursday, 18 Jun 2020 09:30

I really enjoyed the movie. It is very well made. I was impressed by the acting and the directing. The plot is very interesting and I was interested in the ending. I think that it is a very good movie. It is an interesting view of World War 2 and the people involved. I have never seen a movie like this before. I really liked the cast, I really liked the director and I really liked the camera work. I think that this movie is a good choice for any movie lover.
Margaret H.
Monday, 04 May 2020 07:03

This is a classic war movie with an unusual ending, but I'm sure that was the intention. The acting is excellent, especially by the cast of characters, especially Robert Duvall and Al Pacino. This movie is a very realistic look at the war in Viet Nam. It shows the Japanese in Viet Nam as it was in the days of the US occupation of the country, and the reaction of the people to the occupation, to the rise of the communist party and the war. The movie does not pretend to be something it's not, but it is not trying to be something it's not. I saw this movie when I was 15 years old and I was very impressed. My older brother saw this movie when I was 14 and said that it was "very real". In my opinion, this movie is one of the best war movies ever made.
Rose Collins
Monday, 27 Apr 2020 21:58

This is an entertaining film and I have enjoyed it a lot. In some ways it reminds me of Saving Private Ryan. But it is more action and less story. It is one of the few films that I have enjoyed watching this year. I liked the war sequences and it was very interesting. The ending was good and the characters were interesting. The acting was good. The actors did a good job. It was not Oscar worthy. But it was good. The films was a little bit slow in the beginning, but it picks up. The film is well acted and well filmed. It is not the best film but it is a good film.
Amanda
Monday, 27 Apr 2020 01:33

First, I have to say that I was not a fan of this film. I was interested in it for a while but was not very keen on it. I thought it was a good story, but I could not really see it as anything special. I was pleasantly surprised to see that the movie was well made and a very good film. I was not disappointed at all. It was well acted and well directed, and the movie did not suffer from poor acting. I really liked how the story was told and how it was structured. I thought it was well done, and I could see why this movie was so well liked. I have to say that I enjoyed this movie much more than I thought I would. I do not know how this film will do at the box office, but I will be buying it when it comes out. I will definitely buy it and I hope that it will do well at the box office as well. It is not a perfect movie, but it was very good and I thought it was a good movie. It was well done, well directed, and well acted. I liked it very much.
See all 26 reviews
 Write a review