Disclaimer: This site does not store any files on its server.

Watch Around India with a Movie Camera

Around India with a Movie Camera is a movie starring Sabu. The film explores life in India - both British and Indian - in the 50 years leading up to Independence in 1947.

Sandhya Suri

All Systems Operational

Top reviews

Sunday, 20 Sep 2020 08:56

Ravi Shastri is a man who represents the dream of so many people, the idea of the greatness of Indian cinema. His passion for Indian cinema is evident from the very start of the documentary, where he brings out the main pillars of Indian cinema. But what he starts with, he ends with. It is amazing how Ravi handles all aspects of Indian cinema, from the politics to the cast. He walks through many popular movies, from Shantaram, from Aashiqui Dixit, to Kamal to Marathi movies. He starts with the first movies, giving details about the history of cinema in India. Ravi does a good job as an historical person, being very frank in his comments about some films that are currently popular. He starts with the 1930s, the Hindu hero, the Stalinist cinema, and of course the Chinese. He then gets into the communist sub-culture of India, being very blunt in his comments. He describes the pride of the Indian cinema, when he mentions how it is the most popular cinema in the world. He talks about the creativity of the movie-making, and the great films that they are making. He ends the documentary by describing the slow dying of Indian cinema, and how the country is slowly dying, in the way that a family has a dying child, they have to forget about it, and it dies on its own. And it's also the end of the most popular genre of Indian cinema, love stories. He mentions that in India, there are very few love stories, and those love stories are very few. And so it is for the remaining four stories, of Kamal and Rajini, of Aishwarya and Kareena and of Sanjay and Ranbir. It's a good documentary, which should be watched with some of the people who love Indian cinema. But it's not so good as some people claim. The final comment that Ravi gives is very amazing. He describes how the Indian cinema will only live on with their love stories, and that they are the ones that will save Indian cinema. But as we see, it has been a very slow death.
Monday, 07 Sep 2020 09:57

*Spoiler* This is a movie made to see the 2 cultures apart. After watching a movie like this, I thought of it as a very good experience. This movie showed all the highlights of the cultures. In the movie, India's culture is shown as well. This movie also showed the differences between countries. Even if you are from the US, the movie will give you a great experience. I would recommend everyone to watch this movie. There is some dialog that is very interesting to hear. This movie shows the joy and the sorrow, the fears and the strength of each culture. The movie gives a clear view of how Indian culture evolved from the ancient times to the modern times. You also see a lot of cultural things. In the movie, the main character (Terence) was very interesting. He had his own story. He was not someone who had a huge impact on society. He was just like a regular person who just happens to be an Indian. A good example of this is the scene when he was the chief minister and he heard a lot of people talking. The voice of that people had a lot of significance to the Indian culture. There is a scene where he was told that a people was to be brought in a settlement. The chief minister did not want to bring them in the settlement. He said that a village is not a village and that the people were in a state of lack. Terence had a lot of confidence in himself. I thought that this movie was very good and a good education to all people who want to learn more about the different cultures.
Thursday, 04 Jun 2020 22:25

This documentary is divided into two segments: one about the court case that turned into a colossal public controversy, and the second about the documentary itself. The first part is an examination of the film's content, using clips of the story and making comparisons with similar documentaries that were made in the United States. The second segment is a detailed look at the making of the film, including interviews with several people involved in the project. These interviews are done from the perspective of the film, giving an insight into the difficulty of making a film in an environment that is highly constrained and just as difficult as the one that made the actual documentary possible. It is interesting to note that these same difficulties were highlighted by the film's critics as the film was still in production. For example, one of the people interviewed in the film is a supporter of the film, but after the film was made she was made to feel that her name had been tarnished. The film has a couple of detractors, mostly from the political left. However, the film's title is very fitting for the extreme stance it takes. The film is very straightforward in it's presentation, but it has a very strong moral point. It has been compared to a political document, and this is fair, but I think the moral of the film is more important. The most famous of all political documentaries, Citizen X, is one of the most conservative documentaries in its subject matter, but it is still a compelling and important film. This film is less political in its presentation, and it is also more personal. It is interesting to note that a lot of the criticism of this film came from people on the political left, rather than the left as a whole. The most prominent criticism comes from some of the movie's supporters. Overall, this film is very entertaining and interesting. While it is not without faults, it is very well done, with a clear message of injustice and a strong message of hope. I would recommend this to anyone interested in watching an interesting documentary.

Write a review