Disclaimer: This site does not store any files on its server.

Watch Divide and Conquer: The Story of Roger Ailes

(386) 7.0 107 min 2018 Subtitles and Closed Captions

Divide and Conquer: The Story of Roger Ailes is a movie starring Tony Waag, Babette Bombshell, and Catherine Corcoran. A documentary that explores the rise and fall of the late Roger Ailes, from his early media influence on the...

Genres
Documentary
Director
Alexis Bloom
Starring
Catherine Corcoran, Tony Waag, John Reardon, Babette Bombshell

All Systems Operational

Product details

Genres Documentary
Director Alexis Bloom
Stars Catherine Corcoran, Tony Waag, John Reardon, Babette Bombshell
Country USA
Also Known As Sex, Trump & Fox News, Untitled Roger Ailes Documentary, Manden bag Fox News, Divide y triunfarás. La historia de Roger Ailes, Diviser pour mieux régner: l'histoire de Roger Ailes
Runtime 1 h 47 min
Audio Português  English  Deutsch  Italiano  Español  Français  Gaeilge  Svenska  Nederlands
Subtitles Português  日本語  Čeština  Australia  한국어  Filipino  Tiếng Việt  हिन्दी 
Quality 480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Description A documentary that explores the rise and fall of the late Roger Ailes, from his early media influence on the Nixon presidency to his controversial leadership at Fox News.

Download documentary «Divide and Conquer: The Story of Roger Ailes»

Blu-ray
16.06 GB
DVD
5.26 GB
Windows
5.36 GB
MacOS
7.21 GB
MKV
5.51 GB
MP4
5.39 GB
H.264
5.96 GB
H.265
5.39 GB
AVI
3.19 GB
MOV
6.78 GB
DivX
7.59 GB

Customers who watched «Divide and Conquer: The Story of Roger Ailes» also watched

  1. 2067
    2067
  2. Halloween Available on Prime
    Halloween
  3. I'm Thinking of Ending Things
    I'm Thinking of Ending Things
  4. The Trial of the Chicago 7 Available on Prime
    The Trial of the Chicago 7
  5. Hubie Halloween
    Hubie Halloween
  6. In Like Flynn Available on Prime
    In Like Flynn
  7. The Outpost
    The Outpost
  8. Real Steel Available on Prime
    Real Steel
  9. Radioactive
    Radioactive
  10. Kajillionaire Available on Prime
    Kajillionaire
  11. The Kissing Booth 2
    The Kissing Booth 2
  12. The Kissing Booth Available on Prime
    The Kissing Booth
  13. The Addams Family
    The Addams Family
  14. Twister Available on Prime
    Twister
  15. The Babysitter: Killer Queen
    The Babysitter: Killer Queen

21 customer reviews about «Divide and Conquer: The Story of Roger Ailes»

3.5 out of 5 stars 3.5 out of 5 stars

Top reviews

Patrick Reid
Sunday, 25 Oct 2020 23:00

The adage that people with power have a tendency to exploit it is often attributed to the late Steve Jobs. But is it the case that power corrupts? A look at the power of Fox News and Fox Business Network reveals a reality that could seriously damage the trust between the public and the media. "Fox News has a reputation for being the enemy of the American people," says Rachel Maddow, host of MSNBC's "All In." "They claim to be 'neutral' and 'non partisan,' but that is not the case." Maddow shows that the network is anything but neutral. It is owned by Rupert Murdoch, a man who has an estimated fortune of $13 billion. He is a media mogul who uses his money to buy and distribute propaganda. Murdoch wants to control the media and wield influence over the population. He controls many media outlets, including Fox News, the biggest news network in America. At the same time, Murdoch has been trying to find ways to overthrow democratic institutions. In the early 2000s, he started a media watchdog group called the Committee to Protect Journalists. He would bring in reporters from other newspapers to try and discredit news stories that could hurt his business interests. And he hired a former member of the Nixon Administration to work at Fox News. "There is a picture that people can't see," says Maddow. "They say that Rupert Murdoch is a media mogul who doesn't want to be influenced by the press. Well, he is trying to buy up the press, but he is not interested in the press." The Fox News Channel is run by Roger Ailes, who has a reputation for bullying his employees. The network has a reputation for hiring and firing employees without explanation, and for interviewing their enemies without regard for the truth. For example, Ailes hired Gretchen Carlson, a conservative television anchor, to be a contributor to his show. Ailes has allegedly sexually harassed her and then fired her after a meeting. She took her complaints to the Fox News Channel, which agreed to discipline her for the incident. "Roger Ailes is the most powerful media figure in the world," says Maddow. "He controls what we see on TV and what we hear on the radio. He controls what we read, what we see on the internet, what we hear on the radio, and he controls what we hear in print." The Fox News Channel is owned by the Murdoch family, who control a group of media companies in America. Murdoch, who lives in New York, runs Fox News and Fox Business Network. In addition to making the media into a political tool, Murdoch is also a business man who has his eye on other media interests. He wants to build a media empire that will compete with the media conglomerates in the United States. As Ailes has built Fox News, Murdoch has poured money into other media outlets. He has invested in the National Enquirer, the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times, and other publications. "There are so many people who
Thomas King
Friday, 23 Oct 2020 20:41

I was watching "Roger Ailes: The Fox News Mystery" on cable the other day and found myself somewhat enthralled by the story of Roger Ailes and his tenure as Fox News chief executive. Not all that long ago, the most prominent figure in the news industry was considered to be a misogynist, racist, and bigot. He made money by pushing out reporters who were critical of his personal beliefs and by eliminating those who would criticize his views. Yet, he was given a job at Fox News by Rupert Murdoch. The man had a vision of what Fox News would look like, and in his final years, he accomplished that vision. He created the television show "Fox News Sunday," which became the most watched show in the history of television. He created the Fox News Channel, which became the most watched channel in the history of television. The Fox News Channel is what is now called a cable news channel, which Fox News has promoted as a great news source. It is not. In fact, it is mostly the opposite. The story of Ailes is one of the many tales of Fox News, but one that, ironically, is mostly told by those who should know better. I will not say more about the movie because I believe that if you see it, you will know what I am talking about. This movie tells you how Fox News is a very dangerous place. It is a place where you can't really tell a story. One day, a story about a scandal at Fox News and the network's ratings was enough to fire a person who was just in the network, and it is a place where people who are loyal to Fox News and its owner are made to feel that they have to apologize for their actions or else. I am not talking about the "Weasel" scandal, where one of Fox News' anchor-kings was accused of sexual harassment. I am talking about the New York Times story about Ailes, where a group of journalists was threatened by the former chairman of Fox News. The journalists would not do anything about it because they were afraid of being on the losing side of a potential lawsuit from Ailes. The same thing happened with the "Weasel" scandal. I am not talking about the current accusations of sexual harassment or racism against Bill O'Reilly. I am talking about the complaints that Ailes was making about these women who were complaining about him. I am talking about how Roger Ailes made the women feel that they were doing nothing for their careers. He wanted them to know that they were not being taken seriously. That's what this movie shows you. The movie has a few good scenes. I have always liked Bill O'Reilly's antics and I thought the scenes where he was interviewed were amusing. But that is all. If you are not a fan of Fox News or you are not a fan of the company that it has become, then you may not like the movie. I am not saying that the movie is bad, but I am not saying that you will
James
Tuesday, 13 Oct 2020 09:32

Ralph Reed, an old friend of mine, was the best man for this film. His life and the story of the television network and its future are the only true stories of the media. This is not a film about the business of media. It is about the world of media, its end, its beginning, its legacy and its time. A fascinating story. Highly recommended.
Maria Marshall
Friday, 25 Sep 2020 20:38

Despite some incorrect information, it is a good movie. If you have a family member who is someone who has worked for the media and knows about the network and is confused, watch this movie. Even if you are not a FOX employee, this movie will give you some good insight into how the network operates and the way FOX News works. I think the movie would be better with a few more interviews.
Teresa Fowler
Thursday, 10 Sep 2020 15:29

If you are a Fox News viewer, you have probably heard about the political events that took place in this film. In fact, I am a Fox News viewer and a Republican. I thought that this film was very good and worth watching. For example, I thought that it was very funny how many Republicans were crying on camera and saying how they were the victims of a witch hunt by the media. In the film, Fox News has been called the "Gateway to Terror" by many critics, who in reality is the most trafficked terrorist network on the planet. But there was a much more interesting side to this story. During the 1990's, when Fox News was in the news, there was a man named Robert Gibbs who ran the network. His son James would go on to be a White House counselor and the CEO of the Clinton White House. The "Gateway to Terror" is a very interesting and interesting part of this story. The Clinton White House's decision to hire Robert Gibbs as the "chief strategist" for the Clinton White House was a smart decision. I think that Fox News was a great choice for this role because they have a lot of political smarts. I thought that the film was very good and worth watching. I think that Fox News has been accused of being the "Gateway to Terror" but they are not. The people in this film did a great job telling the story of how the Fox News network became the center of the political system. I recommend this film to anyone who is a Fox News viewer, or if you are a Republican, you should watch this film.
Craig Garrett
Saturday, 29 Aug 2020 02:01

The best thing about this documentary is the manner in which it was filmed. It's essentially an interview with three men, who at various times have been at the centre of one of the most interesting news stories in the history of the modern media. It is also a fascinating look at the rise and fall of a man who would go on to become the most powerful television executive in the world. One thing is for sure, although the interviews are good, they are not particularly interesting, and the nature of the interviews is not at all relevant to the subject of the documentary. The best part of the documentary is the way that the men themselves give their own perspectives of their time with Ailes, and their thoughts about the way in which the news was then, and how it is now. This is the strength of the documentary, and it is one of the most interesting things about the documentary.
Patricia L.
Thursday, 27 Aug 2020 03:46

What is the point of these one-sided comments? Why do they feel that being a Democrat is being anti-Republican? The most recent Republican candidate for the presidency, Jeb Bush, is the first ever GOP candidate to go against his party and run as an independent candidate. Yet, this is the first movie ever to take on the topic of the Republican Party and the role of Ailes. A recent ABC News poll found that over half of the American people believe that Roger Ailes is a pedophile. What is the point of being a Democrat or Republican? The first person I've ever voted for was Bernie Sanders, and I never thought I'd be voting for him, but he's the only Democrat I've ever voted for. I'm not saying I vote for anyone based on party affiliation, but the fact is that it is extremely important that we have a voice. Without the support of the Democratic Party, no one would be able to do what they've been doing and say the things that they've been saying in the past.
Maria Schmidt
Monday, 24 Aug 2020 15:56

The New York Times has a lengthy article about Roger Ailes, the top Republican operative in the 2000 presidential election, a case of his dominance that helped him manipulate the debates and affect the outcome. The article is an indictment of Ailes and the way he got his way. Ailes was criticized for promoting conspiracy theories and mocking Democrats, the "liberal media" and the "Democratic Party" for all the wrong reasons. His actions and ideas were criticized for being corrupt and political. These are all valid concerns, but the point of the article is that Ailes had a "passion" for politics. It wasn't a result of money, but a passion. He could be corrupt, but he could also be a really nice guy. The movie is very good. This is a movie you should see. It is not a documentary, but an exploration of a man's motivations and actions. It is not about the shady behavior of Ailes, but rather the ways that he could have possibly done a better job in the 2000 election. The documentary doesn't go into all of Ailes's past actions, but instead the stories of the people who were close to him. Ailes was known for running his own personal campaign, a private TV station, and winning big, but the focus is on how he got his way. I thought this movie was really well done, and I think that the movie is worth seeing.
Catherine Warren
Tuesday, 11 Aug 2020 13:06

I am a big fan of Roger Ailes, and was delighted to learn that this documentary on the "unpleasantness" of his Fox News empire would be available on video. Unfortunately, it's available only on DVD, and I have to say that I was disappointed by it's lack of quality. For a documentary, the editing and sound quality were poor. The cast and crew also seemed to have not the slightest interest in the subject matter. A number of good interviews are interspersed with more than a few of the same segments. I think the lack of quality made it hard for me to fully enjoy this film. The overall presentation is OK, but it just wasn't what I expected. Perhaps it was the editing, perhaps it was the sound quality. Perhaps it was the subject matter, but I just didn't like the presentation. The only other comment I have to make is that the tone was almost desperate. There was an undercurrent of rage and fear throughout the film. I don't believe that the subject matter was a problem, but I do believe that the tone and delivery of the film did not provide a strong enough message to make it work as a documentary. I would recommend this film for those who have never watched a documentary, but who would like to see how Roger Ailes accomplished what he did.
Linda
Wednesday, 29 Jul 2020 23:38

I just saw this film at the Toronto Film Festival and I loved it. I found it to be an entertaining look at the controversial rise and fall of a man who was a household name for decades and became the face of the conservative movement, Fox News. In many ways, the film is like a period piece. It has a glossy look, a general feel to it and the actors are excellent. The story starts with Roger Ailes being selected by Fox News to run their Presidential campaign. Ailes is a small time Republican operative who doesn't like politics but is hired by Fox News because he has some political acumen. He was at the beginning of his career when his boss, Rupert Murdoch, offered him the chance to be the Chief News Reporter at Fox News. Murdoch wanted Ailes to be the first male to anchor the channel and his name was something that a lot of people knew. So Ailes was a hot commodity. The film is about his rise and fall, the rocky relationship with Murdoch, and the reasons that led to him losing his job. But it's also about the real-life battles between Ailes and his boss and the media and how the battle ultimately became a battle of media dominance and how Murdoch took over. The film is divided into two parts, the first focusing on Ailes and the second on the battle. This is a really good look at a man who had a lot of potential but became a very famous figure in a very short time. Ailes was a big deal in politics. His name was associated with the Republican party and his name was on everything. When Ailes was at the top of the list of candidates, he was very popular with Fox News. He had good ratings and the network had a lot of credibility and was respected by the Republican establishment. The film shows how he got the job at Fox News, and how he became the face of the conservative movement. Ailes and the Republican party were fighting a war of media dominance. The media was using the Fox News name to attract viewers and to keep conservative voters. The media was using Fox News to feed conservatives their talking points. Fox News was the right wing's propaganda machine. The film is a good look at the rise and fall of Ailes and his relationship with Murdoch. It's very interesting and well made.
Juan S.
Tuesday, 28 Jul 2020 01:23

I found this documentary extremely informative and moving. As a longtime viewer of Fox News and former News executive, I was really impressed by this film. It was extremely compelling and was able to document Roger Ailes's past, present, and future. Ailes' story, as told in this documentary, was absolutely fascinating. He had an incredibly difficult life and had a lot of support in his life, but he clearly still had the ability to change lives. Although there are some really disturbing and scary things that he did, it is hard to argue that it was necessary to change the lives of millions. He was not a saint, but he truly was an extraordinary human being. It is just so difficult to watch this story unfold, especially because it happened at the time that Ailes was a very popular and influential figure in the media world. It is a story about a man who truly believed in his ability to influence the lives of millions. There are some really powerful things about this documentary, including some really disturbing things. Overall, this documentary was a very strong film that I recommend to everyone. I will be recommending this documentary to my friends and family.
Michelle W.
Saturday, 25 Jul 2020 23:04

Roger Ailes, as many have been saying for years, is the new bad guy in the media. However, there is no evidence of this whatsoever. It is a conspiracy theory, that he is some kind of media genius who "wrote the script" on what the media wants to say. However, this was not the case. When I saw the documentary, I realized how much this person could control a news channel, and how much influence he had. The biggest problem with this documentary is that there is no evidence. There is a lot of evidence that his influence on the media was questionable, but I have never seen any evidence that he "wrote the script" or was the one who did all the work. He was a master manipulator, and I think his ideas on the media were bad. However, I am a feminist and that's why I want to know what his ideas were on the media. If he is not the one who wrote the script, then I think he should have done a better job in controlling the media, because he was one of the few people in the media who was worth paying attention to. I think that the documentary did a good job in showing how much he controlled the media, and I think that it did a good job in telling the story of Roger Ailes. It is interesting to see how the media reacted to this guy, and to see how much influence he had. It is a shame that he was not punished for his crimes, and that he got away with it, because he was a truly evil person. This documentary was really interesting, and I recommend it to anyone who has never heard of Roger Ailes. I think it is a good documentary, and I would watch it again.
Tiffany Hayes
Saturday, 25 Jul 2020 13:33

We all know that Roger Ailes was a self-obsessed media-hating genius. This documentary will get to the core of that. The point of this documentary is to document Ailes and the attempts he made to mold Fox News into the most powerful media outlet in the world. The reason he succeeded is because of the personalities he hired. One of the biggest names was Jeff Zucker, a famous CNN anchor and contributor, who also knew Fox News and its influences from the inside. Zucker played an important role in shaping Ailes' vision for Fox News. In the end, the biggest thing Ailes accomplished was to gain control of Fox News. However, the most interesting part of this documentary is to see how the most powerful man in the world, without question, could screw up and create an ill-conceived network. Zucker himself said that he was more like a private equity investor than a political consultant. And, he was the perfect choice. And, the "Company" was created. Zucker was able to spend his own money to create an alternative to what the Democratic Party has been working to build. He wanted to make the Fox News channel into a pure information source for the American people. With his ideas and money, Ailes managed to turn Fox News into the most powerful media outlet in the world. When Ailes died, it was thought that his wealth would benefit the media, but the truth is that his money went to pay off his investors. This documentary will get you to the truth, and put Ailes' legacy in perspective. The fact that Roger Ailes was able to get away with all of the things he did is simply amazing. I highly recommend this documentary to everyone who cares about the media. It shows us what really happened in the Fox News world, and how the Ailes family can be seen as a hero of the media. I highly recommend this documentary to everyone. I give this documentary a 9 out of 10.
Christopher
Sunday, 12 Jul 2020 10:44

As I was watching this documentary, I had the feeling that it was going to be an excellent movie but it didn't quite hit the mark. The only reason I gave it a 7 instead of an 8 was because the portions of the movie that dealt with the sexual harassment of women were of the most impressive aspect. There were also segments dealing with the scandal that resulted from the alleged sexual harassment of Bill O'Reilly. However, after that, it went down hill from there. The final 10 minutes of the documentary was somewhat shocking to me, and I didn't know what to expect. It was all over the place, and left me with more questions than answers. I thought that the ending of the film was a little weak, and felt like it was left to the audience to fill in the rest of the gaps.
Lisa M.
Monday, 29 Jun 2020 21:15

I watched this movie before and it was very well made, the main reason for watching this was to learn about Roger Ailes. However, the movie was a little slow at times and it was difficult to keep up with it all. It was not very good for people who like to read. This movie would have been better if it had been shorter and at least a little more informative. It also needed a better ending to explain all the problems in the Ailes world. All in all, I thought it was well done. I would recommend this to people who are interested in Roger Ailes.
Joe F.
Sunday, 14 Jun 2020 00:47

One of the best interviews I've ever seen, even better than the recent "Meet the Press" with Chuck Todd. See this movie. I've been following this story for a long time, and it is only getting better. No matter how many times I see it, I find new details and new stories, which makes this a really good movie. It's a hard story to cover, and no matter how much research I do, I still can't find everything. But it is amazing to see the results of the work done by these women, and they are truly amazing. If you have any interest in this story, see this movie.
Judy Collins
Saturday, 13 Jun 2020 21:17

The movie begins in the early 80's when two liberal TV pundits debated the issues of their time: Reagan's domestic policies and the communist threat in Central America. The debate ended up in a decisive way as did the late 90's when the U.S. military invaded Grenada. The topic then shifted to the Clinton Administration and the Iraq War. This topic was tackled in a very compelling and factual way, and the movie doesn't skip a beat. It is very clear that the movie was made with the intention of influencing people to vote for Clinton in the 2000 elections, and this was the point of the movie. Unfortunately the movie misses that mark and shows the administration as either inept or simply incompetent. While the movie did not make me an advocate for Clinton's policies, I did see a new side to the man. The way the movie portrays him is definitely worth a look. As the movie progresses we see him turn from a man who has a strong conservative and a strong liberal stance, to a man who was really only interested in his own career and money. He had a strange personality. We also see him and Bill Clinton having a love affair at the same time. It is clear that Bill Clinton was the catalyst for his wife's policy decisions. But the movie does not show the impact of his policies on the lives of the people in the United States. Instead, we see Clinton as a rather nasty man who had no respect for anyone. He would have us believe that he was actually the good guy. I think the movie failed to convey this point. But the movie did make me understand that while Clinton is a good man, he is not a great one. The movie also fails to address the elephant in the room. Clinton did not have the popularity of Bush or Reagan. People were not buying his policies. They were not buying his wife. The movie also fails to show the difference between the Republican and Democratic Parties. Bush and Reagan were from the Republican Party. Clinton and Bush were from the Democratic Party. This does not necessarily mean that the Democrats are the better party, it simply means that the Democrats are the more conservative party. The movie doesn't go into a great deal of detail as to what the Democrats actually believe. It just seems that they are just a bunch of people who believe in small government and what they call "choice." As for the Republicans, I think they are all the same. They want big government and they want to take away people's rights. I don't think the movie should have been made. I think it is well done, but it was a bit too long and not as entertaining as I would have liked. I think it is an important movie for people who want to see more of the problems in our society. The movie does a good job at making you think and also shows us what was going on in the country back in the 80's.
Donald Warren
Friday, 12 Jun 2020 17:52

This is a very informative and entertaining film about one of the most powerful people in the history of television. The subjects of this film, though not the main focus, include the nature of the relationship between the president and the network, the administration's "sick care" policy, and the evolution of the network. A lot of the material deals with the nature of the president's relationship with the network. These are things that we are all familiar with, but are seldom discussed in this film. There is a lot of information on the evolution of the network, and some of the key players, such as Donald Trump and Roger Ailes, are discussed in detail. A lot of the information is also about the Nixon administration, especially the Nixon White House. Some of the information is not new, and many people know that this was a very controversial period in American history. The movie covers a lot of ground, but does not bog the viewer down. There are lots of images and images of the people involved, such as George H. W. Bush and Ronald Reagan. There is even a little bit of footage of Margaret Thatcher, as well. I really enjoyed this film. It covers a lot of ground, but never seems to bog down. I really like the subject of the relationship between the president and the network, and I really enjoyed the film.
Willie
Saturday, 30 May 2020 18:53

The only thing I would say about this documentary that I found slightly frustrating was that the director didn't interview any of the accusers, or any of the people who were involved with the "horror show" that was Fox News. I think the worst thing that I found was that the documentary was very focused on Ailes. If I were to watch it, I would have heard a lot more from the other accusers. Instead, we only hear from Ailes. There were some really powerful moments with the other accusers. I also think it was a good idea to interview Fox News personalities who were in the news, and I think they played a really important role in the campaign. The one that I especially liked was Melissa Harris-Perry. I think she did a great job at providing a very entertaining interview that we saw throughout the documentary. The way she delivered the questions was just incredible. I think the problem with this documentary is that it is really focused on Ailes. I think the other accusers would have been very interesting to hear from as well. I think it would have been interesting to hear from people who were not directly connected with the Fox News culture.
Douglas
Sunday, 26 Apr 2020 15:52

Saw the movie tonight and it was actually pretty good. It was very well done, very informative and very entertaining. It made a good case against the man who was responsible for the downfall of Fox News. The only thing that bothered me was the fact that Fox's image and brand has been destroyed in the wake of this film. I didn't really think that Fox was a particularly bad network. The people interviewed in the film had an impressive resume that included working at CNN, ABC and NBC, and had been at Fox for many years. They all had been loyal employees, and they all had done very well. There were a lot of good stories and interviews with current and former Fox News employees, and the movie made a good case that they were being unfairly targeted. I liked the film a lot, and I thought that the information was well presented and a great addition to the documentary genre. I was really impressed by the fact that it wasn't only about Fox News, but also about Fox News employees, and Fox News itself. That's the best part of the film.
Brandon A.
Sunday, 26 Apr 2020 11:32

The movie does a great job in bringing out the insecurities of Roger Ailes as the CEO of Fox News. I can say that I was a very negative person about Roger Ailes because of the way he treated his employees and the way he treated women. I was just hoping that the movie would touch on some of the other issues that he was known for. However, there was a lot of content that was very sexist, racist and sexist. There was also a lot of content that was just plain embarrassing and disgusting. The film has an extremely balanced message about the way that Roger Ailes treated his employees and the way he treated women. The movie also covered a lot of other topics such as the influence that pornography has on society and how pornography is the only thing that keeps Roger Ailes in power. The movie also covered a lot of other topics that are not necessarily important to the viewer such as how Roger Ailes is the main reason that Americans hate Donald Trump. The movie also covers the many other controversies that Roger Ailes has faced throughout his career. I also liked how the movie addressed the fact that Roger Ailes was married with two daughters and that he had been married with his first wife for only two years. The movie also touched on the fact that Roger Ailes is a very private person and the fact that he is very controlling of his employees. I was surprised to hear that Roger Ailes had never married in his life. This is definitely a great movie to watch if you are interested in how Roger Ailes had been treated by society. I also liked how the movie showed the issues that Roger Ailes had to face while he was at Fox News. Overall, I would recommend this movie to anyone who is interested in Roger Ailes and his various controversies.
See all 21 reviews
 Write a review