Disclaimer: This site does not store any files on its server.

Watch 7500

7500 is a movie starring Omid Memar, Passar Hariky, and Hicham Sebiai. A pilot's aircraft is hijacked by terrorists.

Drama, Thriller
Patrick Vollrath
Hicham Sebiai, Paul Wollin, Omid Memar, Passar Hariky

All Systems Operational

Product details

Genres Drama, Thriller
Director Patrick Vollrath
Writer Patrick Vollrath, Senad Halilbasic
Stars Hicham Sebiai, Paul Wollin, Omid Memar, Passar Hariky
Country USA, Germany, Austria
Runtime 1 h 32 min
Audio Português  English  Deutsch  Italiano  Español  Français  Gaeilge  Svenska  Nederlands
Subtitles Português  日本語  Čeština  Australia  한국어  Filipino  Tiếng Việt  हिन्दी 
Quality 480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Description A pilot's aircraft is hijacked by terrorists.

Top reviews

Wednesday, 10 Jun 2020 17:42

Of course the theme is revenge and I wouldn't be surprised if it's some of the few films this year that has them prominently present. And that's really the problem with this movie. The theme is nothing but revenge but there are only a handful of threads to work with, and a couple of characters in the film that are extremely unlikely for revenge to come into play. None of the revenge that is discussed or the more brutal methods the survivors use are taken seriously. The first thing you notice is the filmmaker's failure to establish a real, cohesive story. The subplot of the survivor who spends his last few days on earth trying to protect the world he knows from this massacre in Nepal is too similar to his introduction to the survivor on the plane, who is more or less "terrified" at the prospect of becoming a guinea pig. That seems like the same element in their "relationship" and we don't know what that's supposed to mean, or why it's relevant to this movie. The survivor who wants to help others is way too weak and the people he tries to help are far too young. The original survivor we meet on the plane is a very skilled thief, a very impressive tool for the viewer to play with. His character is a bit underdeveloped and instead of feeling his strength we just see him using the weakness of the film to his advantage. The film's main antagonist is clearly supposed to be in league with him. Which means the film plays the psychological mind game that "Guillermo del Toro" intends to play, since he was so successful with films like "Pan's Labyrinth" where the antagonist is really in league with the hero and the hero is in league with the villain. The movie works fine as a thriller but is much more interesting if it had been entirely focused on the tale of the survivors in Nepal. The journey they take through the movie is where we get to know them, we get to feel what their pain is and how they're hurt and how they fight to survive the circumstances that forced them to take action in the first place. The one thing that unites the whole movie is the filmmaking. The location of Nepal is brilliantly filmed with a lot of detail that feels real. It really comes across as a detailed and accurate representation of the landscape. The cinematography is also amazing, the shots are used to capture the overall mood of the scenes. I don't know if this is just one of the most beautiful cinematography I've ever seen but it feels like it could be. Everything feels right and you can feel the actors' impact. But the plot? It doesn't really matter what it is, because we are just supposed to be entertained by it. We don't care about anything in the movie and it's more for the viewers to figure out what it is, whether it's good or bad. But the plot in itself is not the problem here, the problem is the terrible exposition that the filmmaker uses to introduce the characters and the set up. So instead of doing a direct story about the survivors trying to survive, he chooses to tell us what's going on in the characters' heads, or at least what the characters think and want. In other words, he says something to the audience that is easily comprehensible and that he's going to explain later. So while we're waiting for that something to happen, we're getting nothing in the meantime. And in the end it's just a bit more of what we already know from the beginning of the movie that gets explained more than anything else. So, there's a lot of not-so-clever camera tricks, way too many close-ups and a good deal of jumping from one character to another, but it's all for the sake of making you understand something about the characters or the characters themselves, not for the sake of being clever. And to summarize, "The Day After Tomorrow" is a very badly made movie that seems to be more focused on the filmmaking than on a well-made story. There is nothing good about it and there's nothing bad about it. It's just a bad movie. It was nominated for Best Foreign Language film and Best Foreign Film. It's also up for the Golden Globe for Best Foreign Film. It's not at all a bad movie

Write a review