Disclaimer: This site does not store any files on its server.

Watch 7500

(1360) 5.9 92 min 2019 Subtitles and Closed Captions

7500 is a movie starring Omid Memar, Passar Hariky, and Hicham Sebiai. A pilot's aircraft is hijacked by terrorists.

Genres
Drama, Thriller
Director
Patrick Vollrath
Starring
Hicham Sebiai, Paul Wollin, Omid Memar, Passar Hariky

All Systems Operational

Product details

Genres Drama, Thriller
Director Patrick Vollrath
Writer Patrick Vollrath, Senad Halilbasic
Stars Hicham Sebiai, Paul Wollin, Omid Memar, Passar Hariky
Country USA, Germany, Austria
Runtime 1 h 32 min
Audio Português  English  Deutsch  Italiano  Español  Français  Gaeilge  Svenska  Nederlands
Subtitles Português  日本語  Čeština  Australia  한국어  Filipino  Tiếng Việt  हिन्दी 
Quality 480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Description A pilot's aircraft is hijacked by terrorists.

Download drama «7500»

Blu-ray
15.91 GB
DVD
5.11 GB
Windows
5.21 GB
MacOS
7.06 GB
MKV
5.36 GB
MP4
5.24 GB
H.264
5.81 GB
H.265
5.24 GB
AVI
3.04 GB
MOV
6.63 GB
DivX
7.44 GB

Customers who watched «7500» also watched

  1. After Parkland
    After Parkland
  2. Desolation Center Available on Prime
    Desolation Center
  3. Captain Marvel
    Captain Marvel
  4. Mortal Engines Available on Prime
    Mortal Engines
  5. Hollywould
    Hollywould
  6. Touch Me Not Available on Prime
    Touch Me Not
  7. It Chapter Two
    It Chapter Two
  8. Foosballers Available on Prime
    Foosballers
  9. The Hottest August
    The Hottest August
  10. Play the Flute Available on Prime
    Play the Flute
  11. 3 from Hell
    3 from Hell
  12. Wrestle Available on Prime
    Wrestle
  13. Anna and the Apocalypse
    Anna and the Apocalypse
  14. Phoenix, Oregon Available on Prime
    Phoenix, Oregon
  15. Come to Daddy
    Come to Daddy

21 customer reviews about thriller «7500»

2.5 out of 5 stars 2.5 out of 5 stars

Top reviews

Sara
Sunday, 17 Jan 2021 21:23

I am a huge fan of David Mamet, and I have seen all his films. I must say this is his best work yet. It has everything you would expect from a Mamet film, it is a crime drama, a thriller, and it is a true masterpiece. The performances are great, the plot is great, the direction is great, and the screenplay is great. If you haven't seen this film, do yourself a favor and go see it now. It is one of the best films I have seen in a long time. I give it a 10/10.
Wayne
Monday, 11 Jan 2021 05:08

This movie is so sad and so tragic. The main character is in such a terrible situation, but you feel sad for him and you feel for his family. The whole movie is so intense and very moving. The ending is so sad. I think that this movie is one of the best movies I've seen in the past ten years. This movie is a must see.
Larry Sims
Friday, 27 Nov 2020 11:11

I have watched this movie on DVD several times, and I still can't get enough of it. It is so amazing that a movie can take place in a place like this. The story, the cinematography, the soundtrack, everything is perfect. The acting is top notch, the chemistry between the actors is phenomenal. I believe that this is one of the best films of all time, and it has all the elements to make it a classic. If you have not seen it, I strongly suggest you do so.
Austin Fernandez
Friday, 20 Nov 2020 18:57

This is the first movie I've seen with a director's cut. I must say, the ending is fantastic. I thought it was quite intense and believable. The action sequences were great. I thought the plot was very interesting and the acting was top notch. I also loved the music. I can't wait for the director's cut. It's great to see a movie that isn't a typical Hollywood action film. I also thought the movie was very emotional. I was very moved. The ending is a great ending. I highly recommend this movie.
Alice Jones
Sunday, 08 Nov 2020 05:28

A very good movie. The movie is a typical American movie. It is one of those movies that you have to pay attention to and you have to think about. The movie is very good and it makes you think about the situation of the world. The movie is very good and I would recommend it to all the people. It is not just a movie for a movie lovers. It is a movie for all the people who is interested in the world.
Laura
Monday, 02 Nov 2020 06:36

*Spoiler* My guess is that if you liked "The Sixth Sense" or "Signs" you will like this movie. It is not one of the most original movies of all time, but it is a very enjoyable movie. This is another one of those movies that won't be as exciting or startling as other movies, but it is a very good movie. I liked the ending in this movie, although it does leave you hanging. In my opinion the ending is much more realistic than the ending in "The Sixth Sense". That doesn't mean you should change your mind after seeing this movie. Some movies should be left alone, and some movies need to be changed.
Jeffrey Grant
Sunday, 01 Nov 2020 13:14

The movie is very good. I can't find the word to describe the film. It is like a roller coaster ride. The characters are very well written, the actors are very good, the director is very good. The story is very good. I can't find any negative thing to say about this movie. I think that it is very good. It is a must see for any movie lover. I am very happy that I watched this movie. I hope that I can see this movie again. I have to watch this movie over and over again. It is a must watch for every movie lover. 10/10
Phillip Newman
Sunday, 25 Oct 2020 20:59

I am not a big fan of the western genre, but this movie was very good. It was very dramatic, very violent, very bloody. And the fact that the two main characters are both gay is really touching. This movie was very good.
Albert Knight
Wednesday, 21 Oct 2020 16:34

I saw this movie the other day and was completely blown away by it. I was expecting it to be a cliche "let's put a bunch of sex on screen" movie but I was so wrong. The story is unique and the characters are memorable. I think that the movie is one of the best I've seen in a long time and I would recommend it to anyone. If you're not the type of person that likes sex, then don't see it. But if you are, you'll love it.
Gary S.
Saturday, 26 Sep 2020 11:59

Well if I'm not mistaken I saw this film the day it was released in the cinemas but for some reason I was not able to watch it. So I was not able to comment it on IMDb. I decided to watch this movie again and it was definitely one of the better movies I have seen in the past few years. And it is not the best, at least not that I can recall. But it is definitely one of the most original films I have seen in recent years. This movie is one of those that is told from the perspective of the rapist and the victim. In other words, what is happening to them. After all, that is what this film is about. It is a unique movie that involves a multitude of different stories all of which are told by the rapist and the victim in different ways. The movie does a good job of not letting the two stories intersect too much in one. However, as I said before, it is not the best movie I have seen in recent years, but it is definitely one of the most original in recent years. I highly recommend this film.
Kathleen
Sunday, 20 Sep 2020 14:45

As a film critic I just have to say that, I must say that I enjoyed The Informant! But I must say that I don't like the fact that Mark Whalberg has such a fantastic and respected career and not just on the movie industry. The film is an excellent thriller that is fun to watch but a little lacking in details. I think that the film is very well written and gives the audience a real thriller. Mark Whalberg is good in the role of a journalist that is undercover and undercover, just a really good role for him, and so is Oliver Platt and Katie Holmes as a best friend and sister. The only big bad thing about the film is the script. It is well thought out and really gives the audience a real thriller. The film is realistic but the dialogue gets rather slow in some parts and you get bored. It is a good story that keeps you interested and at the end of the film you are left with a feeling of a good film. The Informant is a movie that is worth seeing but I have to say that it has some flaws to it. It is quite hard to watch a movie that has real twists and some really good acting but there are some really funny moments in this film. It is just a good thriller that is very enjoyable and quite fun to watch. If you are a Mark Whalberg fan or a Oliver Platt fan I think you would enjoy this film. It is worth the watch.
Frank D.
Sunday, 13 Sep 2020 19:51

It's a shame that this movie has gotten so much criticism. I found it to be a fascinating and complex movie, with a wonderful and deep story. I thoroughly enjoyed it. The only complaint I have is that the ending was a bit abrupt. The movie could have been longer, and more exciting. But, that's all I have to say about that. I highly recommend this movie. I would definitely recommend seeing this movie.
Joyce Alvarez
Thursday, 03 Sep 2020 11:21

The trailer and the film itself had almost all the bells and whistles you'd want from a film and the cast was spot on. But the hype came too early and the film lacked credibility in its entire presentation. The story is too simplistic and the ending is equally as empty. I wish I could have been more bothered by this but it was so bad. The characters were less than fleshed out and the plot twists were predictable and out of place. The female characters were shallow and shallow. The characters in the trailer were being played out and it was so out of place. The cast was not fantastic and this was most obvious by the end. Overall, this was an over saturated and underwhelming adaptation of a great movie. It was interesting and that's all the really matters. I would rather see it again on cable.
Karen Walters
Thursday, 27 Aug 2020 09:36

Director Bill Zorin, whose first feature film, the wonderful "I Love My Wife and My Wife Only Wants Me," is now on DVD, makes a definite effort here to do the same here with a fairly ordinary first feature - but he comes through. The film tells the story of a couple with a lack of depth. One is a wealthy New Yorker, a career woman, and the other is a working-class guy. The first isn't exactly wealthy, but he lives in a nice apartment with a neat garden and young children. His wife doesn't want him to be involved in their joint finances, and she doesn't want him to be involved in her marriage. That makes life quite difficult for him. The wife isn't quite in love with the guy and isn't particularly upset about his unfaithfulness, which makes it even more difficult for him to build a relationship with her. The film is all the better for this. The second guy has a troubled childhood, and is extremely distrustful of his wife. His love for her isn't as strong as the first guy's, but it's more than worth the effort to have him be a character in the film. In a series of scenes he passes himself off as the first guy's son. The film ends on a happy note, although it would have been more successful had the first guy not been so big on showing how long they were married to each other. No doubt they had an affair. A little less love and sex would have been nice.
Walter
Friday, 21 Aug 2020 12:22

There is no one movie that can be mentioned in the same breath as I was as a boy and adult. The special effects have stood the test of time with their day to day usage and the way the movie portrays the technology in the old days is right on target. This movie keeps you wondering until the very end. The plot keeps you thinking and the acting is top notch and excellent. An epic blend of a novel and a movie. The character development is excellent and their realistic backgrounds are even closer to the real world then I imagined. Like I said I am a 15 year old boy and I loved it. A great adaptation of a novel by a true author. The way the movie portrays technology is perfectly done. This is one of the best movies I have ever seen.
Nicole
Saturday, 15 Aug 2020 05:38

As a born and raised meat eater who decided to forego meat once I got pregnant I think I must have had a skewed view of the hog farmers but as you can clearly see this film gives the story a new twist. I agree with the other reviewers who opined that this was an unusual film for the genre. However I thought that it did a good job of setting the scene and the characters. I also thought the focus was on the farming and you would expect that as you would expect to see any farmer at his breaking point, but there was a different type of tension going on between the farmer and the mother of the pig. All in all I thought this was a good film but I think it would have been better if they had explored more of the idea of the father being a farmer and how his vision differs from his son's. Maybe not the most important thing in the world but it does help if you don't mind being somewhat cynical. Also the film got a little too preachy, so a bit more of a dry-run than the previous entries would have gone a long way.
Emily Elliott
Tuesday, 04 Aug 2020 08:59

This movie is very disturbing and rather grotesque in it's content, especially in it's portrayal of violence towards women. Some of the scenes are reminiscent of the film "Psycho" where a woman goes mad and kills some of her family members. However, the story of this film is completely different and not on par with the Psycho movies. This film is about the girl, Kira, who begins to feel her breasts start to grow, as well as her breasts getting bigger, and finally her breasts growing even larger than before. She also begins to find a huge new target in her life in the form of a blind woman. This is not a typical "boob-fiesta" film where the women are getting themselves to do everything with a bunch of boobies, which is what this film is like. As you can tell from the title, this is a far more realistic film about a woman going mad than "Psycho". Some of the other differences between this film and "Psycho" are: - The director is NOT Hitchcock. This is not a Hitchcock film and is quite different. - The dialogue is much more adult than usual, although it's not like you'd want to see it in a school play. - There's a lot more violence than usual. - There's a lot more sexual content, some of it explicit. - It's more darker than typical American films. - It's not just a bunch of women getting tortured by some evil criminal. There are some women who are murdered, which is very unusual. - Some of the other characters are very well developed and well acted. - There are more sequences of gore and more of violence than usual. - Some of the acting is very good. However, this film is definitely not a comedy, not even an "adult comedy". - There's not a lot of humor, either, although it's hard to say what the director was trying to achieve with this film. As a result, it could be a better adaptation of a hard-to-fit-into-your-head "comedic" character film. It's definitely more of a tragedy film than a comedy. It's not one of my favorite movies but it's an interesting one that deserves to be seen. It's rated "R" for some sexual material and disturbing material.
Michelle M.
Sunday, 02 Aug 2020 06:39

A very violent film in which violence seems to be the norm. I'd have liked to see a few more scenes where the couple are alone together, but the pacing seems to be fine. The acting is very good indeed.
Janice
Saturday, 18 Jul 2020 05:35

Arrival is a gripping thriller/horror with a lot of moral ambiguity. It involves a future in which all is well and the government has created a 'war room' to warn the world, based on a belief that the Earth has been overpopulated and is ailing. The most important thing to remember is that it's not the Earth that is coming to an end, but mankind itself. An Agent named Louise Banks (Amy Adams) is sent to infiltrate a government facility to find out why a bunch of Earthlings are mysteriously dying. She gets put into the new command post (think Apollo 13) where she is told she has the right of refusal but she will not have that right because the President (Bryan Cranston) and Vice President (Jeremy Renner) want control of the entire Earth. So, she's basically an intellectual walk-through. The movie does a fine job at building tension throughout the story. Not to mention the all-star cast, mostly supporting roles. Amy Adams gives a very strong performance. She is obviously very talented but you don't see a lot of her in the film. She does a good job of coming to terms with her past, learning to cope with the loss and understanding how she's handling life now. That's what director Denis Villeneuve does and is worthy of the Oscar for best director. It is a very intense story and the movie works very well. There are some characters that are very under-developed, especially the main character. But there is no reason to keep an out-of-shape Amy Adams at all times. It's not just her, it's a very well-written film with some incredibly beautiful sets and scenes. It is, however, somewhat slow-paced. There are plenty of flashbacks that go nowhere. But that does not matter, because the story is worth paying attention to. It's intense, violent, sad and still has a lot to say about humanity. It has a lot to say about government, war, gender roles and corporate greed. All in all, this is one of the best movies I've seen in 2017. It deserves better than 6.2, but it certainly deserves to be much higher.
Robert B.
Wednesday, 10 Jun 2020 17:42

Of course the theme is revenge and I wouldn't be surprised if it's some of the few films this year that has them prominently present. And that's really the problem with this movie. The theme is nothing but revenge but there are only a handful of threads to work with, and a couple of characters in the film that are extremely unlikely for revenge to come into play. None of the revenge that is discussed or the more brutal methods the survivors use are taken seriously. The first thing you notice is the filmmaker's failure to establish a real, cohesive story. The subplot of the survivor who spends his last few days on earth trying to protect the world he knows from this massacre in Nepal is too similar to his introduction to the survivor on the plane, who is more or less "terrified" at the prospect of becoming a guinea pig. That seems like the same element in their "relationship" and we don't know what that's supposed to mean, or why it's relevant to this movie. The survivor who wants to help others is way too weak and the people he tries to help are far too young. The original survivor we meet on the plane is a very skilled thief, a very impressive tool for the viewer to play with. His character is a bit underdeveloped and instead of feeling his strength we just see him using the weakness of the film to his advantage. The film's main antagonist is clearly supposed to be in league with him. Which means the film plays the psychological mind game that "Guillermo del Toro" intends to play, since he was so successful with films like "Pan's Labyrinth" where the antagonist is really in league with the hero and the hero is in league with the villain. The movie works fine as a thriller but is much more interesting if it had been entirely focused on the tale of the survivors in Nepal. The journey they take through the movie is where we get to know them, we get to feel what their pain is and how they're hurt and how they fight to survive the circumstances that forced them to take action in the first place. The one thing that unites the whole movie is the filmmaking. The location of Nepal is brilliantly filmed with a lot of detail that feels real. It really comes across as a detailed and accurate representation of the landscape. The cinematography is also amazing, the shots are used to capture the overall mood of the scenes. I don't know if this is just one of the most beautiful cinematography I've ever seen but it feels like it could be. Everything feels right and you can feel the actors' impact. But the plot? It doesn't really matter what it is, because we are just supposed to be entertained by it. We don't care about anything in the movie and it's more for the viewers to figure out what it is, whether it's good or bad. But the plot in itself is not the problem here, the problem is the terrible exposition that the filmmaker uses to introduce the characters and the set up. So instead of doing a direct story about the survivors trying to survive, he chooses to tell us what's going on in the characters' heads, or at least what the characters think and want. In other words, he says something to the audience that is easily comprehensible and that he's going to explain later. So while we're waiting for that something to happen, we're getting nothing in the meantime. And in the end it's just a bit more of what we already know from the beginning of the movie that gets explained more than anything else. So, there's a lot of not-so-clever camera tricks, way too many close-ups and a good deal of jumping from one character to another, but it's all for the sake of making you understand something about the characters or the characters themselves, not for the sake of being clever. And to summarize, "The Day After Tomorrow" is a very badly made movie that seems to be more focused on the filmmaking than on a well-made story. There is nothing good about it and there's nothing bad about it. It's just a bad movie. It was nominated for Best Foreign Language film and Best Foreign Film. It's also up for the Golden Globe for Best Foreign Film. It's not at all a bad movie
Billy Griffin
Tuesday, 09 Jun 2020 20:08

This was a big accomplishment for them to get a thriller, though. I never watch cop shows, so this may have affected my opinion, but I do enjoy such shows. The movie is fairly predictable from the beginning and does not take itself too seriously, but its stars make it seem like the story is happening right in front of their eyes. The plot has a number of twists and turns and is never boring. The actors do a good job and the actors seem to be enjoying the show. I enjoyed the movie very much and would recommend it to anyone.
See all 21 reviews
 Write a review