Disclaimer: This site does not store any files on its server.

Watch American Dharma

American Dharma is a movie starring Steve Bannon, Bill Clinton, and Hillary Clinton. A portrait of controversial political strategist and former Donald Trump advisor, Steve Bannon.

Biography, Documentary
Errol Morris
Errol Morris, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Steve Bannon

All Systems Operational

Product details

Genres Biography, Documentary
Director Errol Morris
Stars Errol Morris, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Steve Bannon
Country UK, USA
Runtime 1 h 35 min
Audio Português  English  Deutsch  Italiano  Español  Français  Gaeilge  Svenska  Nederlands
Subtitles Português  日本語  Čeština  Australia  한국어  Filipino  Tiếng Việt  हिन्दी 
Quality 480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Description A portrait of controversial political strategist and former Donald Trump advisor, Steve Bannon.

Top reviews

Thursday, 15 Oct 2020 10:16

The film explores the historical relationships between the Tibetan Buddhist tradition and the establishment of Buddhism in the Chinese Empire, and the role of monks in the imperial court. The film's strengths lie in the detail and insight it provides into the cultural and spiritual life of the Dalai Lama. The film documents his rise to political power in the mid-nineteenth century as the first Dalai Lama, and his death in 1959 as the founding patriarch of the Tibetan Monastic Order. The film also delves into the Dalai Lama's personality, personality traits, and personal experiences, and the roles that monks play in society. The film's strengths lie in the value of compassion and love. The Dalai Lama's commitment to a pure, compassionate, and nonviolent society contrasts with the dictatorial rule of his father, the late King Gyatso, who in addition to his oppressive reign of terror, actively sought to destroy the Tibetan Buddhist traditions. The Dalai Lama's dedication to compassion makes him a more fitting symbol of compassion than the Dalai Lama himself. His character and personal life are also highly fascinating, as he not only challenges the institutionalized monastic system of the Tibetan Buddhist Order, but also challenges the power of his personal rule by creating a system of political and spiritual reform. The film is also informative about the impact of the Dalai Lama's spiritual education in Tibet. The film documents the teachings of a monk, a monk-monk, and a master-monk, and also interviews various experts and Buddhist monks, to form the basis of its factual historical accuracy. This film is an important step in the progression of history, and a great addition to any collection of films. It is an excellent film for anyone who is interested in the history of the Tibetan Buddhism or Tibetan Buddhism in general.
Monday, 28 Sep 2020 12:38

A fascinating story about a young woman who suffered from a psychotic break. The film itself is a moving and powerful insight into mental illness. The entire film follows the young woman, Sheryl Bobbitt, her mother, Diane Ladd, and a few family members, including the daughter, Gail. The film goes through Sheryl's illness, as well as the efforts of the hospital to treat it. One thing I did notice that I didn't really understand at first was why Sheryl was a bit of an outcast. At first I thought it was because of her being gay. But after I realized it wasn't, I realized Sheryl was a bit of a weirdo. She was just different, and she also seemed to be quite the oddball. The fact that she was a disturbed, manic depressive, troubled young woman who was also pretty smart makes her a very interesting character. Sheryl is quite a character. She gets to have her own show, and she's able to tell the story of her illness very well. She was very articulate about the problems she was facing, and she's able to be quite frank and honest about her illness. I found her to be a very relatable character, because she is very intelligent and very well spoken. And she is very honest with her own thoughts. It's also interesting to know that Sheryl was the one who made the hospital promise to be a good, caring place. The hospital had just been shut down, and Sheryl had to pay a lot of money to stay there. So she had to go through a lot of difficulties to get back to her life. I liked the fact that the hospital promised that if she was able to get better, the hospital would promise to be a good place to stay. I thought the hospital was very helpful, as well. The staff was very understanding, and they really helped Sheryl to get over her illness, as well as make her life better. They even brought her a few books that she liked. I would recommend this film to anyone who is interested in mental health. It is a good film, and I think everyone should see it.
Saturday, 26 Sep 2020 14:03

The film is largely a celebration of three remarkable people. Two of these are Cusack and Byrne, who, like it or not, are the archetypal "others" to the "others" the filmmakers portray. The third is Steve Martin, who is played as a miserable recluse. The film is part documentary, part fairy-tale, and part social-realist classic, but not without its occasional niggling details. For example, the concept of "a kinder, gentler, bigger than the beast" applies just fine to Cusack and Byrne, as well as to Martin and Martin (how could it not?). Still, "Dangerous Minds" is a remarkable, poignant, and inspiring film, and a whole lot more. For a long time, I would say that Steven Brill's "Gone with the Wind" was the "best picture of the year", and I wouldn't be so hasty in this case. However, "Dangerous Minds" is an entirely different animal. That's not to say that "Gone with the Wind" was bad, I mean that the sheer depth of this film is simply extraordinary. It's as if the magic of cinema were at work here, and Brill was merely a cog in the machine. And to say that "Dangerous Minds" is a masterpiece would be an understatement. There are two of them, as the film is a portrait of three real people, whose lives and work would be never-ending and completely unique in their own rights. But, the film is also a sort of moralistic manifesto, a promise of social-change and a wish to see the world that Martin and Martin represent become a little bit more better for the people who are the subject of this documentary. The film is the type of film that reminds us of the timeless value of art, and the need for more creative freedom. We see the absurdities of the real world, but we also see the trivialities and hypocrisies of the Hollywood system. This is a film to be savored, and never forgotten. I give it a 9 out of 10, but it really is worth at least a 10. It's that good.
Saturday, 26 Sep 2020 04:33

I was fortunate to attend the film premiere at the Toronto International Film Festival and I am very pleased with the final product. This is the first time that I have seen a biopic that has the depth, the coherence, the originality and the humor that the British and American film-makers have worked so hard to achieve. The film is anchored by the main character, Tony, played by Ian McShane, who portrays his life through his own words. This is what is the greatest quality of the film. It is that McShane, rather than putting his own words and using a script to convey his message, is just the opposite - making the film his own words. In addition to his insightful remarks, McShane, through his performance, has given us a portrait of how a man can become involved in a struggle for change. Without the wisdom and compassion of McShane, this film would not have been nearly as powerful. And, as I said at the beginning of the film, this is the first time I have seen a film that is a direct and honest portrayal of the political process. That is, it is not a movie that tells the viewer what is right and wrong. Instead, it takes us into the political process in a manner that allows us to see the truth behind the arguments that are used to promote our political agenda. From my perspective, it is a perfect film for the entire family. For me, the film captures the essence of our lives and makes us reflect on our lives through the lens of our youth. And, to the writer, director and all of the other cast and crew members, I say, "Thank you."
Sunday, 13 Sep 2020 21:04

Since his creation of the Dharma project, Richard Rorty's work has provided the theoretical framework and theological premises to which a huge number of other philosophers and theologians have subscribed. His book is the keystone of all the books by thinkers such as Francis Bacon, William of Ockham, Thomas Aquinas and Pico della Mirandola. The film is a great example of how to bring his ideas to the screen. David Martin, a veteran of TV and film, has assembled a fascinating account of his life and his scholarly career. However, the film also gives insight into Rorty's life, which is filled with the kind of contradictions that scholars strive to avoid. Rorty's personal life is rich and multifaceted, and is as diverse as his work. His wife, Jean, was a professional woman of art. His son, Douglas, had a rocky upbringing. His daughter, Caroline, is a political and social activist, and has had some interesting experiences in the civil rights movement. His former wife, Jacqueline, was pregnant with his second child when he was born. He had a brother, David, who had a much more successful life than his father. He and his second wife had a son, Richard, who became a writer. Richard was a serious, if sometimes temperamental, boy who was sent to an institution. The couple lived a rather dysfunctional life, and the film gives some insight into their relationship. Rorty also had a good relationship with his son, who was sent to an institution and then moved on to a better school. The film goes into a lot of detail about Rorty's sexual proclivities, but the most interesting thing is the story that emerges from the archives of the National Library of Australia. One of the researchers, Norman Glickman, interviewed the young Rorty. The young man was self-confident and proud of his achievements. Glickman recounts that the young man was confronted by two "supermen," who presented him with an art exhibit entitled "The Artist." The young man was so fascinated by the paintings that he immediately began to collect them. In the course of his collectibles, he acquired an enormous number of works by the great Renaissance painters, especially Hieronymus Bosch and Titian. He also acquired several paintings by Van Gogh and was drawn to many of the works of T.S. Eliot. The young Rorty's desire to understand the works of the great masters led him to the Institute of the Arts, where he had a taste for fine art. In the course
Friday, 17 Jul 2020 12:38

Very interesting documentary. It shows you the slow change in that city. It's a reminder of how important each city is in the United States. From the beginning to the end, it is almost an hour and a half. The producers are very careful and straightforward about the choices they have made. The journalists are not shown with the same caution, which I found interesting. It is like you are really there in the city, there are so many stories, there are so many things to talk about. They cover every day from the 7th of September to the 25th of October. They go through so many hours, there are so many stories, you don't know what day to start or end. Sometimes they give a bit of information, but you won't be able to remember what day or what time. They don't let you feel as if you are watching a documentary, but as if you are living it. The last part is made up of a very interesting conversation with five people. It's almost like a documentary without any words. It is like a personal conversation with people who don't know each other but they want to be friends. They are not enemies, but they are friends who talk with each other a lot. It's like a friendship that they were missing, but they finally get it. That is very interesting. As for the people, I don't know the names of the people in the film, but they were interesting. One of the people actually worked for CNN for four years and she is an expert on Afghanistan. She was interviewed by the producers, and she says that she had to do that because she had a very difficult time telling her story in the beginning. She was very very brave. Her boss said she was doing a good job, but she is not there very often. She is a very very brave woman. She actually went to the press, and she said that the CNN was not in Afghanistan, they were not doing any interviews. I am pretty sure that CNN is very active in Afghanistan, but I can't be sure. That was a little bit hard to watch. Another important thing is that they went through the history of a journalist and a journalist who is still working in the city. It was like a different world compared to the one they knew. They were so surprised about that. One of them was a very important journalist and then he retired. He knew how things were. He didn't know what to do with his life, he was very disappointed because he had been there for almost three years. I think that he would have said that the camera was his friend. He is so helpful, and he has to give a lot of advice to the people. One of the other journalists told a story, but they don't tell it to the viewers. They are very discreet about that. So that is another thing I was interested in. But I think it's not that important to know that. I think that they should have told the viewers that. Because of that, I give it a 9 out of 10.
Saturday, 02 May 2020 11:34

This documentary is a personal experience for me. I am a trained philosopher, and like many, I do not believe in reincarnation. In fact, I'm against it. It's quite the contrary. I was convinced of reincarnation as a child. When I became an adult, I had a few years of practice with reincarnation. I even thought I understood it. My question was, "Does it work?". It did, but it was a long time ago, and in the end I realized that it was only a theory. I did not believe in it. That is why I had a spiritual awakening. This film is about that awakening. It is a compelling, honest, compelling film. The acting is very well done. The audience gets to understand the implications of reincarnation. What I learned from the film was that it's not a simple matter of belief. It's a philosophical question. Some say it's a religious question. Well, it's a philosophical question. What do you believe in? This film shows that the real issue is that we should never be separated from our essence. To a degree, you cannot separate the essence from the ego, and the ego from the soul. Reincarnation is a philosophical question. I think it's not a religious question, but the question of how we are connected to the divine and our eternal nature. It's a philosophical question that is more than that. It's a question about the nature of existence and how we are connected to our selves. This is a philosophical film, not a religious one. The religious part of this film is only a background to the philosophical question. This film is philosophical, but in a way that is very simple. It's a film about the soul, not about religion. It's a film about the soul and the essence. It's not about religion, and I think that's a good thing. It shows the importance of religion in the lives of many people, and that it's not the whole picture of life. It's not about the death of a loved one. It's about our connection to our soul and to the universe. It's a question about what happens when we die. This film is deeply philosophical. It's not about spirituality or religion. It's about the soul, our connection to our essence and the universe. This is a film that touches and inspires. It's very simple. It's not religious, but it touches the soul, the essence and the universe. It's a deeply philosophical film. I think it's a very good movie. I'm glad that this film is available in DVD

Write a review