Disclaimer: This site does not store any files on its server.

Watch Cold Case Hammarskjöld

(1599) 7.6 128 min 2019 Subtitles and Closed Captions

Cold Case Hammarskjöld is a movie starring Mads Brügger, Clarinah Mfengu, and Saphir Wenzi Mabanza. Danish director Mads Brügger and Swedish private investigator Göran Björkdahl are trying to solve the mysterious death of Dag...

Genres
Animation, Documentary, History
Director
Mads Brügger
Starring
Mads Brügger, Saphir Wenzi Mabanza, U Thant, Clarinah Mfengu

All Systems Operational

Product details

Genres Animation, Documentary, History
Director Mads Brügger
Writer Mads Brügger
Stars Mads Brügger, Saphir Wenzi Mabanza, U Thant, Clarinah Mfengu
Country Belgium, Norway, Sweden, Denmark
Also Known As Hvem dræbte Dag Hammarskjöld?, Mysteriet Hammarskjöld, Kto zabił sekretarza generalnego ONZ?, Hammarskjöld: caso sin resolver, Hammarskjöld byla, Nerešeni slučaj Hamaršeld, Odlozený Případ Hammarskjold, Fallet Hammarskjöld, Caso abierto: Hammarskjöld, Zaboravljeni slučaj Hammarskjöld, Murder in the Bush: Cold Case Hammarskjöld, Cold case à l'ONU, White Is the Colour of Death, Hammarskjöld, döglött akták, Wer tötete Dag Hammarskjöld?
Runtime 2 h 8 min
Audio Português  English  Deutsch  Italiano  Español  Français  Gaeilge  Svenska  Nederlands
Subtitles Português  日本語  Čeština  Australia  한국어  Filipino  Tiếng Việt  हिन्दी 
Quality 480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Description Danish director Mads Brügger and Swedish private investigator Göran Björkdahl are trying to solve the mysterious death of Dag Hammarskjöld. As their investigation closes in, they discover a crime far worse than killing the Secretary-General of the United Nations.

Download animation «Cold Case Hammarskjöld»

Blu-ray
16.27 GB
DVD
5.47 GB
Windows
5.57 GB
MacOS
7.42 GB
MKV
5.72 GB
MP4
5.6 GB
H.264
6.17 GB
H.265
5.6 GB
AVI
3.4 GB
MOV
6.99 GB
DivX
7.8 GB

Customers who watched history «Cold Case Hammarskjöld» also watched

  1. The Seagull
    The Seagull
  2. Walking on Water Available on Prime
    Walking on Water
  3. Hotel Artemis
    Hotel Artemis
  4. Damascus Cover Available on Prime
    Damascus Cover
  5. Gongjak
    Gongjak
  6. Pagalpanti Available on Prime
    Pagalpanti
  7. The Wretched
    The Wretched
  8. Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald Available on Prime
    Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald
  9. The Untold Story
    The Untold Story
  10. The Kid Available on Prime
    The Kid
  11. Change in the Air
    Change in the Air
  12. Beirut Available on Prime
    Beirut
  13. Nobody's Fool
    Nobody's Fool
  14. Myung-dang Available on Prime
    Myung-dang
  15. National Theatre Live: Macbeth
    National Theatre Live: Macbeth

15 customer reviews about documentary «Cold Case Hammarskjöld»

3.5 out of 5 stars 3.5 out of 5 stars

Top reviews

Virginia Sullivan
Tuesday, 27 Oct 2020 10:36

I don't know what to say about this documentary except that it's entertaining. I do believe it was a lot of fun to watch, but I don't know that it was that good. The movie is about the horrific murders that occurred in the early 1970s in Sweden. It's about the unsolved murder of a girl and the subsequent investigation into it. The film is about what the police did and didn't do. I think the movie is good because it shows the police doing what they can, but it's not good because it shows the police doing what they can't. In the movie, the police didn't arrest the guy who was the ringleader of the murders. They just didn't pursue the case. But I think that the movie is better than the police's conduct because it shows that the police are trying to do their best. But it's not good because the police are doing what they can't.
Pamela
Monday, 21 Sep 2020 16:33

I came out of the movie theater not knowing what to expect. A bunch of spanish people dressed up like posers and doing nothing and talking with a lot of poo. But the movie was really good, I would recommend it to people who are into science fiction movies, but I would not recommend it to those who are into science fiction. If you are into science fiction, you might like this movie, but I wouldn't recommend it to science fiction lovers.
Nicholas Reyes
Tuesday, 15 Sep 2020 09:49

Being the only child of Icelandic parents, I've always wanted to be an archaeologist. Since the birth of my sister in Iceland, I have followed the discoveries of archaeology in Iceland in the pages of the local newspaper. And after watching this documentary, I can say that this documentary made me a more scientific archaeologist. I can't say it's a good film, but it's a good documentary. I enjoyed the fact that it was made with a low budget, because that made it more realistic. I think it's better to have a documentary without a lot of graphics than having a movie with high graphics. The fact that the film was made in Iceland made it more realistic. The scene in the museum was actually filmed in the Institute of Ancient History of Reykjavik. I recommend this documentary to people who want to understand archaeology better. I also recommend this documentary to people who want to know the real archaeological discoveries in Iceland.
Keith Torres
Wednesday, 09 Sep 2020 03:05

I was very surprised with this film. It was very well done, although somewhat slow in parts. The overall picture was just right. I didn't know much about the case, but there were a lot of things I didn't know. There were some things I didn't like. The thing that I did like the most was how the documentary got to the real facts of the case. The story line of the film was pretty good, as was the editing. I think the editing and the story line worked together to create a very good film.
Jordan L.
Tuesday, 08 Sep 2020 02:31

I was thinking it would be a nice documentary on the recent Icelandic history, but what I got was something else entirely. It was an extreme, mostly dramatized documentary about the events leading to the Icelandic banks problems. It was basically just showing what happened to the banks in Iceland during the crisis and how they ended up where they were. The documentary was mostly about the Icelandic banks and Iceland's economy, but also about the banking system in general. And the documentary did a good job of presenting both sides of the story. However, it did have a few flaws. The documentary seemed to be overly focused on the Icelandic banks and didn't really go into much of the other side of the story. This could have been a good documentary for those who are interested in Iceland's financial situation, but for everyone else, it's just too much on one side of the story. It felt like it was dragging on and on and it could have been edited down a lot to a much more enjoyable length. That's not to say that it's a bad documentary. It's still good and I still think it's a good documentary, but it could have been better. The documentary itself, though, was good, but it's not as good as the documentary was a documentary about Iceland's financial crisis.
Jeremy
Saturday, 05 Sep 2020 07:57

This movie is not a very good documentary, but it has some entertaining moments. It has a story about a man who was convicted of being a terrorist and sent to prison. After he gets out, he wants to have his name cleared. It has an interesting plot and the film includes interviews with a few former inmates and a few former judges. It also includes footage from several documentaries. There are also a few clips of the actual trial. The documentary was pretty much boring, but it was interesting to see how it went. It's probably not worth seeing unless you are a fan of the subject.
Ann Meyer
Sunday, 09 Aug 2020 00:08

This documentary about the mysterious disappearance of a young Swedish girl in the 1970s has been done many times before. It's also been done by the Swedish Broadcasting Corporation. The Swedish government has also done it before, once. The problem with this documentary is that it is based on a book, a novel, and a documentary, and the director doesn't really know what he is doing. He doesn't seem to have any idea what to do. He knows that it is a documentary about the case, but he doesn't know what to do with it. There is no commentary, no information, no more than the television channel had when it first aired this documentary in the 1970s. He just goes through the case in a very amateurish way. He doesn't even get to see the original notes that the police had gathered, and he doesn't even get to see the original reports. This documentary is just a long and very boring series of interviews, and it is a very long and very boring series of interviews. It is not a documentary that can be re-aired. This is a documentary that is meant to be seen, but it is not a documentary that can be re-aired.
Grace Graham
Tuesday, 21 Jul 2020 18:59

The narrator of this documentary is a man named Jon, who, by his own admission, did not know what to do when he found out that his sister had been abducted. His sister had been going to a friend's house in order to get a television. Instead, she was kidnapped, and when Jon realized what had happened, he went to the police and reported his sister missing. The police took Jon's story seriously and tried to find out where his sister had gone. But Jon didn't know anything about the disappearance of his sister, so he just stayed there, listening to the police, watching the TV, and going to work. The documentary then goes into the beginning of his life, starting from when he was a child and when he became a teenager. This documentary is good, because it is interesting, and is quite funny at times. The narration is also good, because it really helps the viewer to get the point of this documentary. And the documentary does show the strange things that happen to people who have been kidnapped, so it is good to see this documentary. The documentary is not perfect, however, because it does show some scenes that are not really necessary, such as the ones that show people being shot at. And it does show some scenes that are not necessary, such as the ones that show the kidnapping itself, or the ones that show the aftermath. But overall, the documentary is quite good, and is worth watching.
Diane
Thursday, 09 Jul 2020 05:31

I really enjoyed this film. I found the interviews and personal information to be very interesting. It would be interesting to see a book about the movie. There are many things I'd like to know about the production. What was the budget of the film? What did the cast and crew think of the film? What kind of music were the songs? Were the songs good or bad? Did the movie receive an R rating? The filmmakers did say the movie was shot in black and white. Were the colors good or bad? What does the color "golden" mean? How does the color "silver" mean? I think the soundtrack was great. It was really good to hear the Beatles, Pink Floyd, Led Zeppelin, and the Velvet Underground. The songs are catchy and add to the film. I would love to hear what the directors thought of the movie. I think it's great how the movie was made. It's a must see movie for everyone. I think it's a great movie.
Amy
Friday, 26 Jun 2020 16:03

This is a film that didn't really surprise me. It was interesting, but also not all that surprising. I mean, the subject of a conspiracy to kill an American president, and what it means, and who it was in the end, all remains a mystery. Even with that, I still think it's interesting enough, with some pretty interesting interviews, to warrant a viewing. This film follows the case of Robert Hanssen, a CIA contractor, who is convicted of killing a high-ranking official in Saudi Arabia, and who is in prison in the United States. His story, while still interesting, is interesting enough to warrant a viewing. That said, this film is not all that entertaining. The interviews are interesting, but not all that interesting. Some of the interviews are just a little boring, while others are interesting. I do think that the film itself is good, and some of the interviews are pretty interesting. The film does have some interesting stuff, but the interview's that really stood out, were the ones that we were just waiting for, but never got. Overall, I would say that this is a good documentary about the case, but not really all that entertaining, or interesting. The film has some good stuff, but I would recommend it to fans of the subject, or fans of interesting interviews.
Frank R.
Monday, 15 Jun 2020 19:42

The world is currently in the middle of a culture war, and the video games have been used to make arguments about both sides of the argument. This is an educational documentary about video games, a movie with some interesting facts. The movie is narrated by a video game journalist, and features interviews with game developers, game designers, and gamers, as well as a discussion on the games and video games. It is an interesting discussion, with some interesting facts, but I don't believe it is the definitive documentary on video games. The film is mostly about video games, and I don't believe that is the best way to talk about them. The film contains some information on the gaming industry, but it is mainly about the gaming industry, and it doesn't really delve into the history of video games. The film doesn't really cover the cultural impact of video games, and I don't believe it should have. It is interesting that the film did mention the work of Rayman, and the other games, but it is not really clear what the game is, or how it fits into the rest of the movie. The documentary itself is mostly just about video games, and the history of games, but it is really not that great. The movie could have been better, and the documentary could have been better. It does contain some interesting facts, and some interesting information, but it is not that great.
Gloria Austin
Monday, 15 Jun 2020 07:49

What a great documentary! I've been looking for this film for a long time and finally found it, and I was very pleased with the content. It's a must see for any fan of the original. This documentary does a great job of putting the viewer in the shoes of the cast and crew of the movie. I was very impressed with how they mixed the music into the film, and I can't wait to see the soundtrack on vinyl. The people in the cast are amazing and so were the people behind the scenes. I'd love to see this film get the recognition it deserves.
Brenda
Saturday, 13 Jun 2020 07:33

Crazy-American-girl-slaughter-guy-lives-in-a-tatoo-shop-and-consumes-doll-paintings. These sorts of movies are never made for the viewing pleasure of the masses. They are made to be appreciated by those who know the history of the art-world, to appreciate the great art that was made in the twentieth century, and to see how the artist is depicted. Here we have the most famous American artist of the twentieth century, David Duchovny (who plays the title character) playing a part that is so far removed from his usual persona that it is almost a parody. This is a masterpiece of acting. I'd seen him on television, in TV movies, in commercials, and in movies. Not only that, but I'd seen him in films, he's a very good actor. There are so many ways to convey his character that it is almost impossible to convey him without being entirely funny. The film is the story of his life and the life of the art that he was involved in, and how they influenced him and the people he worked with. The music, the movie, the actors, everything is very good. It is my opinion that David Duchovny and Dicaprio are the best of the best. Dicaprio's performance was completely believable, as was the acting of the other actors. There were moments that felt a bit off, but I didn't really notice. It was a great film, definitely worth seeing.
Wayne Morgan
Tuesday, 02 Jun 2020 10:54

The real Hammarskjold was an exceptional political figure and a figure that all of us are familiar with. If you want to know the history of the war in Indochina, this documentary is for you. The documentary is well edited and tells the story well, in an appealing manner. However, I felt it could have been better. It was a bit too self-conscious, with the documentary highlighting the traits of the man and not his political or personal failings. I felt the documentary could have been a little more self-aware about its subject matter and more personal. This documentary was a good example of a documentary that you could watch over and over again. It was interesting, informative and entertaining.
Matthew
Friday, 01 May 2020 15:44

It is impossible to ignore the influence of the likes of Steven Spielberg and George Lucas in the development of the film "Hannibal". However, despite a very superficial similarity in title, the two films are quite different in content and style. I won't try to discuss the themes and themes which were clearly outlined in the first (a little better) film. In this one, we have a sequence of events which seem to be the same but the writer and director have chosen to create an entirely different story. The emphasis on the technical aspects of film-making is absent in this one and what's left is the story of how the serial killer has been reactivated and what drove him to kill again. The biggest problem with this movie is the lack of continuity. The events that are taken place in the first one are different and there is no explanation for the way events are presented and the order in which they take place. Even if we accept that the idea of the serial killer, his back story and what he did in the beginning of the movie are the same, how can we explain the reoccurring violence and brutality in this movie? We are never allowed to find out why Hannibal murdered these people or why he killed again after a few days in the beginning. It seems like a story which is written by a schoolboy who has never done anything significant in his life and who is about to be sent to a mental hospital for no reason other than to introduce a character. The "movie" does not reach the same level of brilliance that the first one did. It's a decent movie but not a good one and as it's a sequel, it can only be appreciated by those who have already watched the original.
See all 15 reviews
 Write a review